Explains how to set up TLS certificates for internal services using split-horizon DNS, a VPN with DNS resolver, and ACME clients like acme.sh with Let's Encrypt, providing a practical alternative to self-signed certificates.
# TLS certificates for internal services done right
Source: [https://tuxnet.dev/posts/tls-for-internal-services/](https://tuxnet.dev/posts/tls-for-internal-services/)
Title is a bit clickbait\-y — YMMV, but let me explain why I think “this is the way”\. Let’s start with a simple example — we have a server which hosts bunch of HTTP services\. Some of those services are external, others internal\. In order to reach the internal ones you need to be connected to the VPN\.
For the sake of simplicity let’s consider we have two choices:
1. We use top\-level domain[restricted by ICANN for private use](https://itp.cdn.icann.org/en/files/root-system/identification-tld-private-use-24-01-2024-en.pdf)— e\.g\.`\.internal`\.
2. We use a public apex domain that we own — e\.g\.`tuxnet\.dev`
Grafana would be our example internal app\. Let’s assume that it’s reachable on`10\.0\.1\.10`internal IP address and our VPN has DNS resolver features\.
## What’s wrong with`\.internal`then?
We could simply create a DNS record of type “A” that resolves to`10\.0\.1\.10`internal IP address — e\.g\.`grafana\.tuxnet\.internal`\. But then if we don’t want it to be a plain text HTTP service we would need to create a self\-signed certificate\.
The good part is that there are plenty tutorials that show you how to do this \(e\.g\.[this one](https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/how-to-create-a-self-signed-ssl-certificate-for-nginx-in-ubuntu-16-04)\)\. The ugly part is that suddenly every HTTP client should be configured to trust this self\-signed certificate\. Alternatively we could just tell our users to ignore the TLS certificate errors`¯\\\_\(ツ\)\_/¯`\.
## How to do it “the right way”
Meet the “split\-horizon DNS” configuration\. For public DNS resolvers our`grafana\.tuxnet\.dev`domain resolves to a public IP and for clients connected to the VPN this domain resolves to an internal IP\.
The good part is that since it resolves to a public IP we can use some public CA like Let’s Encrypt or ZeroSSL\. The ugly part is that we still need some WAF rejecting traffic that does not originate from the VPN\.
Considering pros and cons of both solutions I think it’s much easier to set up a WAF in one place \(on our server\) than to install self\-signed certificate on every machine that joins our internal network \(… or advising our users to suppress the TLS errors\)\.
## ”Talk is cheap show me the code”
We have theory now, time to get our hands dirty\. We will need:
1. A VPN with DNS resolver features — I choose[NetBird](https://netbird.io/)\.
2. ACME client for issuing a certificate — I choose[acme\.sh](https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh)\.
3. A reverse proxy with WAF features in front of our grafana — I choose[nginx](https://nginx.org/)\.
If you’ve read my other blog posts you probably noticed that I am a fan of NetBird \(sorry Tailscale\)\. Thanks to[Custom Zones](https://docs.netbird.io/manage/dns/custom-zones)feature, NetBird does all the heavy lifting required for “split\-horizon DNS” for us\. By using[user groups](https://docs.netbird.io/manage/access-control#user-groups)or[peer groups](https://docs.netbird.io/manage/access-control#peer-groups)we can selectively apply Custom Zones so that server uses public DNS resolver for`grafana\.tuxnet\.dev`\.
Why exclude server from that custom zone? It’s not required unless we want to use[http\-01 challange](https://letsencrypt.org/docs/challenge-types/)\. Using other methods is also possible but for the sake of this blog post I choose`http\-01`\. Ok, let’s get the certificate now with:
```
acme.sh --issue -d grafana.tuxnet.dev --server letsencrypt --standalone
```
`acme\.sh`is quite flexible and has[a lot of modes](https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh#%EF%B8%8F-supported-modes)\. The cool part about the standalone mode \(enabled with`\-\-standalone`flag\) is that our nginx doesn’t have to listen on port 80 at all\. This port becomes “active” only when`acme\.sh`gets the certificate\.
Ok now we can put nginx into action\. This is our config:
```
upstream grafana {
server localhost:3000;
}
map $http_upgrade $connection_upgrade {
default upgrade;
'' close;
}
server {
listen our-server.netbird.cloud:443 ssl;
server_name grafana.tuxnet.dev;
http2 on;
ssl_certificate /etc/ssl/certs/grafana.tuxnet.dev.crt;
ssl_certificate_key /etc/ssl/private/grafana.tuxnet.dev.key;
access_log /var/log/nginx/grafana.tuxnet.dev.access.log main;
error_log /var/log/nginx/grafana.tuxnet.dev.error.log warn;
location / {
proxy_pass http://grafana;
proxy_set_header Host $host;
}
# Proxy Grafana Live WebSocket connections.
location /api/live/ {
proxy_pass http://grafana;
proxy_http_version 1.1;
proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade;
proxy_set_header Host $host;
}
}
```
There is one key setting in this configuration worth explaining —`listen our\-server\.netbird\.cloud:443 ssl;`\. We are binding to the VPN network interface of our server\. Instead of`our\-server\.netbird\.cloud`this could be a VPN IP address\. In practice this will reject any traffic to`grafana\.tuxnet\.dev`that originates from public internet — this is our Web Access Firewall\.
Security is about layers \(just like onions and ogres\)\. Our first layer is split\-horizon DNS but if for whatever reason it fails or is cleverly bypassed we have a 2nd layer \- WAF \- that should hold the line\.
Last but not least — certificate auto renewal\.`acme\.sh`has a out\-of\-the box`\-\-cron`flag\. Now we need a daily cron job that will call
```
acme.sh --cron
```
`acme\.sh`automatically chooses which certificates should be renewed\. All we need to do is to make sure that cron job copies new certificates into the location defined in nginx’s`ssl\_certificate`and`ssl\_certificate\_key`\. Nginx also needs to be reloaded to use new certificates\. Our cron job could look like this:
```
main() {
refresh_certs
sync_api_tuxnet_dev_certs
sync_internal_tuxnet_dev_certs
reload_nginx
}
refresh_certs() {
setcap CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE=+ep /usr/bin/socat1
sudo -u acmesh /home/acmesh/acme.sh/acme.sh --cron
setcap -r /usr/bin/socat1
}
sync_api_tuxnet_dev_certs() {
local green=$(get_checksum "$API_SRC_KEY")
local blue=$(get_checksum "$API_DST_KEY")
local key_allowed_group=www-data
if [[ "$green" != "$blue" ]]; then
sync_certs "$API_SRC_KEY" "$API_DST_KEY" "$API_SRC_CERT" "$API_DST_CERT" "$key_allowed_group"
fi
}
sync_internal_tuxnet_dev_certs() {
local green=$(get_checksum "$INTERNAL_SRC_KEY")
local blue=$(get_checksum "$INTERNAL_DST_KEY")
local key_allowed_group=www-data
if [[ "$green" != "$blue" ]]; then
sync_certs "$INTERNAL_SRC_KEY" "$INTERNAL_DST_KEY" "$INTERNAL_SRC_CERT" "$INTERNAL_DST_CERT" "$key_allowed_group"
fi
}
reload_nginx() {
nginx -t
systemctl reload nginx
}
get_checksum() {
sha256sum "$1" | cut -d' ' -f1
}
sync_certs() {
local src_key="$1"
local dst_key="$2"
local src_cert="$3"
local dst_cert="$4"
local key_allowed_group="$5"
cp -v "$src_key" "$dst_key"
logger "synced $dst_key"
cp -v "$src_cert" "$dst_cert"
logger "synced $dst_cert"
chown root:${key_allowed_group} "$dst_key"
chown root:ssl-cert "$dst_cert"
chmod 640 "$dst_key" "$dst_cert"
}
main "$@"
```
Small comment about`setcap CAP\_NET\_BIND\_SERVICE=\+ep /usr/bin/socat1`\.`acme\.sh`in standalone mode uses`socat`in order to listen on port 80\. On one hand we don’t want to run`acme\.sh`as root if we don’t have to\. On the other hand port 80 is one of the “privileged ports” and by default, privileged ports can’t be bound to non\-root processes\. This is where`CAP\_NET\_BIND\_SERVICE=\+ep`helps\. You can check[this article](https://www.baeldung.com/linux/bind-process-privileged-port)if you’re interested more in this topic\.

Life’s good, we have a TLS that just works — no matter if the service is internal or external, no matter if it’s “next day” or “next year”\.
## Bonus — SANs and CNAMEs
What if we have more internal services? What if we want them under separate subdomains? Do we need to generate separate certificates for each? The answer is “no” and we have two solutions for that:
1. Wildcard certificates — I’m not a fan of it because of[security implications](https://knowledge.digicert.com/quovadis/ssl-certificates/ssl-general-topics/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-a-wildcard-certificate)\.
2. TLS SAN \(Subject Alternative Name\) — where apart of CN \(Common Name\) we define mentioned SANs\. For more info check[https://www\.ssl\.com/faqs/common\-name/](https://www.ssl.com/faqs/common-name/)
So in practice we can create “A” record for`internal\.tuxnet\.dev`and then “CNAME” records for`grafana\.tuxnet\.dev`and e\.g\.`analytics\.tuxnet\.dev`that resolve to`internal\.tuxnet\.dev`\. Then we generate one certificate like this:
```
acme.sh --issue -d internal.tuxnet.dev -d grafana.tuxnet.dev -d analytics.tuxnet.dev --server letsencrypt --standalone
```
where its details look like this:
```
echo | openssl s_client -connect internal.tuxnet.dev:443 2>/dev/null | openssl x509 -noout -subject -ext subjectAltName
```
```
subject=CN=internal.tuxnet.dev
X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:
DNS:analytics.tuxnet.dev, DNS:grafana.tuxnet.dev, DNS:internal.tuxnet.dev
```
All we need to do now is to re\-use the same certificate for different`server`definitions in our nginx configs\.
## Summary
We’ve learned how to securely set up TLS certificates for internal services without creating TLS issues for http clients downstream\. All thanks to split\-horizon DNS, WAF and ACME protocol\. All for free\!
An in-depth explanation of TLS certificate validation on Linux, covering trust stores, chain building, and common pitfalls such as missing intermediates. The article clarifies why different tools may disagree on certificate validity.
The article argues that ignoring DNSSEC exposes users to man-in-the-middle attacks, using examples from email, Matrix, and XMPP, and draws a parallel to the historical resistance against HTTPS.
This article describes how to set up a private FreeBSD package repository secured with mutual TLS, including creating a custom certificate authority and configuring nginx to require client certificates.
The post outlines a method for performing man-in-the-middle attacks by buying a domain, obtaining an HTTPS certificate, and selling the domain to exploit certificate persistence.