R^3-SQL: Ranking Reward and Resampling for Text-to-SQL
摘要
# Paper page - R^3-SQL: Ranking Reward and Resampling for Text-to-SQL Source: [https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.25325](https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.25325) ## Abstract R$^3$\-SQL addresses inconsistencies in scoring functionally equivalent SQL queries and improves candidate recall through unified reward ranking and agentic resampling techniques\. Modern[Text\-to\-SQL](https://huggingface.co/papers?q=Text-to-SQL)systems generate multiple candidate[SQL queries](https://huggingface.co/papers
查看缓存全文
缓存时间: 2026/05/11 10:44
Paper page - R^3-SQL: Ranking Reward and Resampling for Text-to-SQL
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.25325
Abstract
R^3-SQL addresses inconsistencies in scoring functionally equivalent SQL queries and improves candidate recall through unified reward ranking and agentic resampling techniques.
ModernText-to-SQLsystems generate multiple candidateSQL queriesand rank them to judge a final prediction. However, existing methods face two limitations. First, they often score functionally equivalentSQL queriesinconsistently despite identical execution results. Second, ranking cannot recover when the correct SQL is absent from the candidate pool. We propose R^3-SQL, aText-to-SQLframework that addresses both issues through unified reward for ranking and resampling. R^3-SQL first groups candidates by execution result and ranks groups for consistency. To score each group, it combines apairwise preferenceacross groups with apointwise utilityfrom the best group rank and size, capturing relative preference, consistency, and candidate quality. To improve candidate recall, R^3-SQL introducesagentic resampling, which judges the generated candidate pool and selectively resamples when the correct SQL is likely absent. R^3-SQL achieves 75.03execution accuracyon BIRD-dev, a new state of the art among methods using models with disclosed sizes, with consistent gains across five benchmarks.
View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.25325 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.25325 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.25325 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
相似文章
Progress-SQL:通过渐进式奖励改进文本到SQL的强化学习
Progress-SQL 提出了一种多轮强化学习框架,采用渐进式奖励用于文本到SQL,利用 Oracle 引导的诊断树提供密集的奖励信号,并在 BIRD 和 Spider 等基准上改进 SQL 查询生成。
SERL-SQL:面向Text-to-SQL强化智能体学习的选择性事后蒸馏
SERL-SQL提出了一种面向多轮Text-to-SQL智能体的选择性执行反馈强化学习框架,利用教师-学生似然差距对SQL动作token上的GRPO优势进行重新加权。该方法在BIRD和Spider基准上取得了强劲的结果。
用记忆替代训练:面向Text-to-SQL的列表式选择
MaP-SQL 通过采用结构化记忆检索和基于排列的排名聚合,无需微调即可增强 Text-to-SQL 的列表式选择性能,在减少令牌使用量的同时超越了最先进的方法。
排名质量相同,决策却不同:衡量并减少 LLM 评分器中的顺序依赖性
本文指出,基于 LLM 的评分器即使产生相同的排名质量,当提示中候选内容的顺序发生变化时,仍可能做出不同的决策,并提出顺序一致性 SFT(OC-SFT)来惩罚不同排列顺序下分数的不一致。在重排序、响应排序和多文档问答任务上,OC-SFT 在保持排名质量的同时,提升了决策稳定性。
使用结果奖励模型进行Text-to-SQL的测试时验证
本文提出GradeSQL框架,使用结果奖励模型(ORM)进行Text-to-SQL的测试时验证,在BIRD和Spider基准上分别比基于执行的Best-of-N方法提升4.33%和2.10%。