Hadith computational science in the age of large language models: a critical narrative review

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

This paper critically reviews hadith computational science in the era of large language models, highlighting progress, gaps in methodology, and proposing a research agenda to enhance evidence infrastructure for Islamic scholarship.

We examine how hadith computational science is being reshaped by transformer models, retrieval-grounded pipelines, and large language models (LLMs). Recent reviews document growth in the literature, but they do not yet provide a critical account of which advances are methodologically robust, which remain benchmark-bound, and which unresolved problems still limit scholarly use. We address this gap through a critical narrative review that combines critique of existing reviews, paper-level appraisal of representative original studies, and synthesis of Islamic scholar and domain-expert perspectives on authenticity, authority, and responsible use. We find uneven progress. Data resources have expanded, segmentation tasks have matured, narrator and source-verification problems are better formalized, and LLM-assisted workflows now support corpus-scale enrichment, multilingual access, and grounded evaluation. At the same time, progress remains constrained by narrow corpora, weak benchmark comparability, synthetic-to-real transfer gaps, narrator identity resolution, preprocessing fragility, limited reproducibility, and sparse expert-grounded validation. We show that important gaps lie beyond dominant benchmarks: non-canonical and obscure corpora, commentary and explanatory literature, cross-source links with Qur'an and seerah, and fiqh-facing evidence support. We argue that hadith computation should be assessed less as isolated model performance than as an evidence infrastructure problem requiring knowledge integration, provenance, and expert supervision. On this basis, we define a research agenda for making the field methodologically stronger and more useful to Islamic scholarship.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/24/26, 04:39 AM

Paper page - Hadith computational science in the age of large language models: a critical narrative review

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.20364

Abstract

Hadith computational science is evaluated as an evidence infrastructure challenge requiring integration of transformer and retrieval-based methods with expert validation and provenance.

We examine how hadith computational science is being reshaped bytransformer models,retrieval-grounded pipelines, andlarge language models(LLMs). Recent reviews document growth in the literature, but they do not yet provide a critical account of which advances are methodologically robust, which remain benchmark-bound, and which unresolved problems still limit scholarly use. We address this gap through a critical narrative review that combines critique of existing reviews, paper-level appraisal of representative original studies, and synthesis of Islamic scholar and domain-expert perspectives on authenticity, authority, and responsible use. We find uneven progress. Data resources have expanded, segmentation tasks have matured, narrator and source-verification problems are better formalized, and LLM-assisted workflows now support corpus-scale enrichment, multilingual access, and grounded evaluation. At the same time, progress remains constrained by narrow corpora, weak benchmark comparability,synthetic-to-real transfergaps, narrator identity resolution, preprocessing fragility, limited reproducibility, and sparse expert-grounded validation. We show that important gaps lie beyond dominant benchmarks: non-canonical and obscure corpora, commentary and explanatory literature, cross-source links with Qur’an and seerah, and fiqh-facing evidence support. We argue that hadith computation should be assessed less as isolated model performance than as an evidence infrastructure problem requiring knowledge integration, provenance, and expert supervision. On this basis, we define a research agenda for making the field methodologically stronger and more useful to Islamic scholarship.

View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageAdd to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608\.20364

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.20364 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.20364 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.20364 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

Computational conceptual history of scientific concepts: From early digital methods to LLMs

arXiv cs.CL

This paper situates large language models within the broader history of computational approaches to concept analysis in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science (HPSS), reviewing methodological challenges and LLM-based case studies for lexical semantic change detection. It covers corpus construction, operationalization, and evaluation across both pre-LLM and LLM-era workflows.

Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languages in Humanities Research

arXiv cs.CL

This paper systematically evaluates the applications of large language models in low-resource language research, analyzing opportunities and challenges across linguistic variation, historical documentation, cultural expressions, and literary analysis. The study emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration and customized model development to preserve linguistic and cultural heritage while addressing issues of data accessibility, model adaptability, and cultural sensitivity.