@levie: Great post on how to think about open source AI and the applied AI layer. Two things will always be true in AI. Frontie…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

The post discusses the dynamic between frontier AI models and specialized tuned models, emphasizing that both will continue to grow due to the applied AI layer that allows enterprises to evaluate and mix models for their specific use cases.

Great post on how to think about open source AI and the applied AI layer. Two things will always be true in AI. Frontier intelligence will likely remain at the forefront of solving brand new used cases and often be used for orchestrating and planning of any type of complex workflow. At the same time, as use-cases become mature and predictable in an enterprise context, you can begin to peel off some set of the tokens to either lower cost open or closed models *or* models that are trained for the task at hand. Doing this too early in the adoption curve of any new use-case doesn’t make sense as you don’t know what you’re optimizing for, which is why there will always be a bit of a lag here. This process can essentially run on forever as there is no end for both the benefits of frontier intelligence or tuned models. This is why the spend and token volume for both approaches will continue to go up for years to come as we’re still early on both. Again, the only reason this dynamic is possible though is because of the applied AI layer that can effectively eval their workflows in a specific domain, choose a mixture of models to solve tasks, and have enough scale to eventually train their own models for their purposes.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/07/26, 01:22 AM

Great post on how to think about open source AI and the applied AI layer. Two things will always be true in AI. Frontier intelligence will likely remain at the forefront of solving brand new used cases and often be used for orchestrating and planning of any type of complex workflow.

At the same time, as use-cases become mature and predictable in an enterprise context, you can begin to peel off some set of the tokens to either lower cost open or closed models or models that are trained for the task at hand.

Doing this too early in the adoption curve of any new use-case doesn’t make sense as you don’t know what you’re optimizing for, which is why there will always be a bit of a lag here.

This process can essentially run on forever as there is no end for both the benefits of frontier intelligence or tuned models. This is why the spend and token volume for both approaches will continue to go up for years to come as we’re still early on both.

Again, the only reason this dynamic is possible though is because of the applied AI layer that can effectively eval their workflows in a specific domain, choose a mixture of models to solve tasks, and have enough scale to eventually train their own models for their purposes.

Similar Articles

@rhythmrg: https://x.com/rhythmrg/status/2066561780495896785

X AI KOLs Timeline

The article argues that enterprises should post-train their own custom AI models for mission-critical, high-volume use cases to achieve differentiation, cost savings, and control over tradeoffs, rather than relying solely on general frontier models.