AA introduces Coding Agent Index - Performance Comparisons between Model & Harness Combinations

Reddit r/singularity News

Summary

Artificial Analysis introduces the Coding Agent Index, a new benchmark suite combining SWE-Bench-Pro-Hard-AA, Terminal-Bench v2, and SWE-Atlas-QnA to evaluate the performance of AI coding agents across diverse tasks.

>**The Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index includes 3 leading benchmarks that represent a broad spectrum of coding agent use:** ➤ **SWE-Bench-Pro-Hard-AA**, 150 realistic coding tasks that frontier models struggle with, sampled from Scale AI’s SWE-Bench Pro ➤ **Terminal-Bench v2**, 84 agentic terminal tasks from the Laude Institute and that range from system administration and cryptography to machine learning. 5 tasks were filtered due to environment incompatibility ➤ **SWE-Atlas-QnA**, 124 technical questions developed by Scale AI about how code behaves, root causes of issues, and more, requiring agents to explore codebases and give text answers More details in their X post: [Artificial Analysis on X](https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2053865095076438427/photo/1)
Original Article

Similar Articles

AI Coding Agents Can Reproduce Social Science Findings

arXiv cs.CL

This paper introduces SocSci-Repro-Bench, a benchmark of 221 tasks to evaluate AI coding agents' ability to reproduce social science findings from original data and code. It finds that frontier agents like Claude Code and Codex can reproduce a large share of results, with Claude substantially outperforming Codex, and that results are not primarily driven by memorization.

There is no benchmark for the agent that merged your pull request.

Reddit r/AI_Agents

Artificial Analysis launched a coding agent index that tests harness and model combinations separately, highlighting that benchmark tasks differ from real production needs. The article argues that teams should evaluate agent configurations on their own codebases and workflows rather than relying solely on standardized benchmarks.