How far from "Her"

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence News

Summary

Reflecting on the 2013 film 'Her', this article examines how close current AI technology is to replicating the film's autonomous, real-time-interpreting AI, concluding that while progress has been made, full consciousness remains elusive.

I recently rewatched the 2013 film **Her.** Back then, I really enjoyed it and obviously considered it a 100% sci-fi movie. Today, the gap between reality and fiction is narrowing, and it made me wonder: *how long will it take to exactly replicate the AI from the film?* To those tempted to answer "we’re already there," I’d like to remind you that the AI in the movie interprets what it sees and hears in real-time, responding instantaneously. In addition, Samantha shows elements of autonomous consciousness: she has her own desires and "off-screen" life. [View Poll](https://www.reddit.com/poll/1tcz04o)
Original Article

Similar Articles

I looked inside an AI generated movie, and the best parts were all human

The Verge

The Verge examines Cully Hill Boys, an AI-generated movie from Higgsfield, noting that while the technology is advancing, the film's strengths still come from human artists—the script, the directors' style, and the actors' licensed likenesses. The piece also highlights Higgsfield's Cinema Studio tools and new Seedance 2.5 functionality.

What do you think will happen in the future with ai?

Reddit r/artificial

The post discusses fears of an AI-driven technological singularity, referencing the 2014 movie Transcendence and Anthropic's recent call for a globally coordinated pause on advanced AI development due to risks of recursive self-improvement.

The future of AI

Reddit r/artificial

The author reflects on AI dependency and argues that human verification of AI outputs may be the ultimate limit on progress. They suggest transhumanism and neural augmentation could keep humans meaningfully in the loop, making the future one of human augmentation rather than obsolescence.