RL-ARC: Calibrating Large Reasoning Models via Reasoning-guided Uncertainty

arXiv cs.AI Papers

Summary

本文提出 RL-ARC,一个校准感知的训练框架,通过联合利用推理置信度与答案置信度来校准大型推理模型,缓解 RLVR 训练导致的过度自信问题,并在 ID 和 OOD 设置下提升校准表现而不显著牺牲推理性能。

arXiv:2610.11352v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models (LMs) are commonly trained with Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to enhance their reasoning capabilities. However, since RLVR does not explicitly account for calibration during training, it can lead to severe calibration degradation, including overconfidence. Recent calibration-aware training methods for LMs, which incorporate objectives for uncertainty estimation into training, improve calibration but still exhibit overconfidence under distribution shift, while sacrificing reasoning performance. To this end, we propose RL-ARC, a calibration-aware training framework that jointly leverages reasoning confidence and answer confidence. Specifically, RL-ARC leverages reasoning confidence as an auxiliary signal for calibrating answer confidence, applying it as reasoning-guided regularization for correct cases and as an overconfidence penalty for incorrect cases. Comprehensive results across ID and OOD settings show that, beyond improving calibration, RL-ARC enables reasoning models to adaptively estimate confidence based on the given question without substantially sacrificing reasoning performance, thereby highlighting the importance of reasoning confidence for training reliable reasoning models.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/09/26, 06:29 AM

# RL-ARC: Calibrating Large Reasoning Models via Reasoning-guided Uncertainty
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11352](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11352)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.11352)[HTML \(experimental\)](https://arxiv.org/html/2610.11352v1)

> Abstract:Language models \(LMs\) are commonly trained with Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards \(RLVR\) to enhance their reasoning capabilities\. However, since RLVR does not explicitly account for calibration during training, it can lead to severe calibration degradation, including overconfidence\. Recent calibration\-aware training methods for LMs, which incorporate objectives for uncertainty estimation into training, improve calibration but still exhibit overconfidence under distribution shift, while sacrificing reasoning performance\. To this end, we propose RL\-ARC, a calibration\-aware training framework that jointly leverages reasoning confidence and answer confidence\. Specifically, RL\-ARC leverages reasoning confidence as an auxiliary signal for calibrating answer confidence, applying it as reasoning\-guided regularization for correct cases and as an overconfidence penalty for incorrect cases\. Comprehensive results across ID and OOD settings show that, beyond improving calibration, RL\-ARC enables reasoning models to adaptively estimate confidence based on the given question without substantially sacrificing reasoning performance, thereby highlighting the importance of reasoning confidence for training reliable reasoning models\.

## Submission history

From: Gukhyeon Lee \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/c0807ee5/2610.11352)\] **\[v1\]**Thu, 8 Oct 2026 06:45:24 UTC \(4,638 KB\)

Similar Articles

CALIBER: Calibrating Confidence Before and After Reasoning in Language Models

arXiv cs.CL

The paper introduces CALIBER, a method for calibrating confidence in reasoning language models by eliciting confidence estimates both before and after reasoning, with supervision targets matched to the information state. It achieves significant reductions in Expected Calibration Error (up to 52.5%) and strong Brier scores and AUROC across multiple benchmarks.

REDaCT: Collapse-Free Unlearning in Large Reasoning Models

arXiv cs.LG

REDaCT提出一种面向大型推理模型的推理时无遗忘框架,通过二元泄漏检测器与纠正性嵌入优化,在彻底移除遗忘集信息的同时完全避免推理链崩溃,实现近乎完美的答案与CoT遗忘并显著保留推理能力。

Mitigating Cognitive Bias in RLHF by Altering Rationality

arXiv cs.AI

This academic paper proposes a method to mitigate cognitive biases in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) by dynamically adjusting the rationality parameter based on LLM assessments of annotator reliability.