RL-ARC: Calibrating Large Reasoning Models via Reasoning-guided Uncertainty
Summary
本文提出 RL-ARC,一个校准感知的训练框架,通过联合利用推理置信度与答案置信度来校准大型推理模型,缓解 RLVR 训练导致的过度自信问题,并在 ID 和 OOD 设置下提升校准表现而不显著牺牲推理性能。
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/09/26, 06:29 AM
# RL-ARC: Calibrating Large Reasoning Models via Reasoning-guided Uncertainty Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11352](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11352) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.11352)[HTML \(experimental\)](https://arxiv.org/html/2610.11352v1) > Abstract:Language models \(LMs\) are commonly trained with Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards \(RLVR\) to enhance their reasoning capabilities\. However, since RLVR does not explicitly account for calibration during training, it can lead to severe calibration degradation, including overconfidence\. Recent calibration\-aware training methods for LMs, which incorporate objectives for uncertainty estimation into training, improve calibration but still exhibit overconfidence under distribution shift, while sacrificing reasoning performance\. To this end, we propose RL\-ARC, a calibration\-aware training framework that jointly leverages reasoning confidence and answer confidence\. Specifically, RL\-ARC leverages reasoning confidence as an auxiliary signal for calibrating answer confidence, applying it as reasoning\-guided regularization for correct cases and as an overconfidence penalty for incorrect cases\. Comprehensive results across ID and OOD settings show that, beyond improving calibration, RL\-ARC enables reasoning models to adaptively estimate confidence based on the given question without substantially sacrificing reasoning performance, thereby highlighting the importance of reasoning confidence for training reliable reasoning models\. ## Submission history From: Gukhyeon Lee \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/c0807ee5/2610.11352)\] **\[v1\]**Thu, 8 Oct 2026 06:45:24 UTC \(4,638 KB\)
Similar Articles
CALIBER: Calibrating Confidence Before and After Reasoning in Language Models
The paper introduces CALIBER, a method for calibrating confidence in reasoning language models by eliciting confidence estimates both before and after reasoning, with supervision targets matched to the information state. It achieves significant reductions in Expected Calibration Error (up to 52.5%) and strong Brier scores and AUROC across multiple benchmarks.
Confidence-Calibrated Inference Expansion for Evaluator-Guided Test-Time Reasoning
该论文将评估器引导的测试时推理建模为一个计算感知的三动作控制器(trust、fallback、expand),通过学习并校准动作特定的置信度估计来优化推理计算分配,在 Qwen3-8B 上实现约 30% 和 16% 的计算节省。
REDaCT: Collapse-Free Unlearning in Large Reasoning Models
REDaCT提出一种面向大型推理模型的推理时无遗忘框架,通过二元泄漏检测器与纠正性嵌入优化,在彻底移除遗忘集信息的同时完全避免推理链崩溃,实现近乎完美的答案与CoT遗忘并显著保留推理能力。
CoRA: Confidence-Rationale Alignment for Reliable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
This paper introduces CoRA, a GRPO-based reinforcement learning framework that aligns LLM confidence with generated rationales to improve the reliability of chain-of-thought reasoning, achieving up to 26.51% reduction in misalignment error across multiple benchmarks.
Mitigating Cognitive Bias in RLHF by Altering Rationality
This academic paper proposes a method to mitigate cognitive biases in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) by dynamically adjusting the rationality parameter based on LLM assessments of annotator reliability.