Why low-latency Java still requires discipline?
Summary
An article discussing the ongoing need for disciplined coding practices in Java to achieve low-latency performance, despite modern JVM optimizations.
Similar Articles
Slow Software: The Case for High-latency Systems Development
The article argues that the decoupling of development speed from system importance, accelerated by AI coding, leads to fragile critical systems with wide blast radius failures, and advocates for 'slow software' that enforces careful design.
There continue to be reasons for software to be slow
The author argues that while LLMs make certain optimizations cheaper, software can still be slow due to factors like increased tolerance for latency in asynchronous workflows and other practical constraints.
Tune Code Before Your Garbage Collector
Benchmarking shows that optimizing Java code (e.g., reducing SLF4J logging) has a far greater impact on latency than choosing a garbage collector, especially at high percentiles.
@0xlelouch_: 90% of Java in 2026 comes down to mastering these 10 concepts. Everything else is syntax trivia. 1) JVM memory model + …
A thread listing 10 essential Java concepts for 2026, covering JVM memory model, concurrency, collections, I/O, exceptions, performance, tooling, debugging, security, and observability.
Clojure is almost as fast as C (with some help)
This article details how Clojure, with the JVM's Vector API and careful optimization, achieved frame rates within 20% of C for a 3D stress test, demonstrating that a dynamic language can approach low-level performance on hot loops.