@jakevin7: Today I directly used GPT5.6-Sol to build Maka's official website. Found that Sol's frontend capability is still not good. It can only be said that compared to 5.5, there is improvement, but compared to other models' frontend capabilities, it's far behind.
Summary
User @jakevin7 tested GPT5.6-Sol to build Maka's official website and believes its frontend capability, though improved, is still far behind other models.
Similar Articles
@xingbugengming: I don't have the GPT 5.6-Sol model, but I spent an hour using up five hours' worth of quota to test the frontend capabilities of GPT 5.6-Terra. The results were very impressive, especially when handling image matting—it's amazing. I asked it to create a webpage: an interactive card of Guan Yu from the Three Kingdoms, with mouse drag...
The user tested the frontend capabilities of GPT 5.6-Terra, creating an interactive Guan Yu card webpage from the Three Kingdoms. The results were outstanding, particularly in image matting and depth-of-field perspective.
@Saccc_c: I used the newly released GLM 5.3 to create a landing page website for itself, and the overall animations and aesthetics are quite impressive. According to the official scores, GLM 5.3's coding capability has improved by 50% over the previous generation and tops the open-source models. After a few hours of experience, the front-end coding is basically on par with Kimi K3, and bug fixes are quick and precise.
User @Saccc_c shares the experience of using the newly released GLM 5.3 to create a landing page website, emphasizing its 50% improvement in coding capability, leading in open-source models, and being on par with Kimi K3 in front-end coding.
@mylifcc: Jason's comparison of real projects is well-written. Fable 5 indeed shines in complex coding tasks: almost no low-level mistakes, proactively considers edge cases, strictly adheres to the brand system, and can quickly solve tasks in a 13-year-old codebase where GPT has failed multiple times...
User @mylifcc shares their evaluation of Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol on complex coding tasks, believing that Fable 5 has high accuracy but high cost, proposes a hybrid workflow model, sparking discussion on combining model usage.
@10xmylife: - Looks like there are three models, but actually only Sol is available (lol) - ChatGPT and Codex merged, now called ChatGPT Work. I used Sol this morning, tokens burned too fast, immediately got a limit warning, scary.
OpenAI starts rolling out GPT-5.6 series models Sol, Terra, and Luna, while ChatGPT and Codex merge into ChatGPT Work. Users report that Sol model consumes tokens extremely fast.
@VraserX: GPT-5.6 Sol looks absolutely insane. If these early benchmarks hold, Fable 5 just got cooked. Better performance, bette…
Speculation about OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol model showing impressive benchmark performance, hinting at a potential release soon.