The Distillation Game: Adaptive Attacks & Efficient Defenses

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

This paper studies distillation attacks where model outputs can enable imitation, proposing a minimax game framework and a forward-pass-only defense called Product-of-Experts, showing that adaptive students recover more capability than passive evaluation suggests.

Distillation attacks create a deployment trade-off for model providers: the same outputs that make a model more useful can also make it easier to imitate. We study this trade-off through a minimax game between a utility-constrained teacher and an adaptive student. Our framework yields tractable one-sided response rules: an adaptive evaluation rule in which the student reweights high-value examples, and a teacher-side defense template that suppresses outputs most useful for distillation. From a cheap proxy for example value, we derive Product-of-Experts (PoE), a simple forward-pass-only defense that combines the teacher with a proxy student during generation. Empirically, adaptive evaluation reveals a large passive--adaptive gap: on state-of-the-art defenses, adaptive students recover substantially more capability than passive evaluation suggests on GSM8K and MATH. Under this stronger evaluation, the apparent robustness gap between expensive defenses and PoE narrows considerably, while PoE remains substantially cheaper and preserves higher-quality reasoning traces. Overall, our results suggest that strong distillation remains difficult to stop, and that progress on antidistillation should be judged against adaptive students rather than passive ones. Our code is available at: https://github.com/ysfalh/distillation-game.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/09/26, 08:44 AM

Paper page - The Distillation Game: Adaptive Attacks & Efficient Defenses

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.22737 Published on May 29

·

Submitted byhttps://huggingface.co/ysfalh

Aon Jun 8

Abstract

Distillation attacks create a trade-off for model providers, where useful outputs also enable imitation, addressed through a minimax game framework with adaptive evaluation and defensive strategies.

Distillation attackscreate a deployment trade-off for model providers: the same outputs that make a model more useful can also make it easier to imitate. We study this trade-off through aminimax gamebetween autility-constrained teacherand anadaptive student. Our framework yields tractable one-sided response rules: anadaptive evaluationrule in which the student reweights high-value examples, and a teacher-sidedefense templatethat suppresses outputs most useful for distillation. From a cheap proxy for example value, we deriveProduct-of-Experts(PoE), a simpleforward-pass-only defensethat combines the teacher with aproxy studentduring generation. Empirically,adaptive evaluationreveals a large passive--adaptive gap: on state-of-the-art defenses,adaptive students recover substantially more capability than passive evaluation suggests on GSM8K and MATH. Under this stronger evaluation, the apparent robustness gap between expensive defenses and PoE narrows considerably, while PoE remains substantially cheaper and preserves higher-quality reasoning traces. Overall, our results suggest that strong distillation remains difficult to stop, and that progress on antidistillation should be judged againstadaptive students rather than passive ones. Our code is available at: https://github.com/ysfalh/distillation-game.

View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.22737 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.22737 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.22737 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

Adaptive Teacher Exposure for Self-Distillation in LLM Reasoning

Hugging Face Daily Papers

Adaptive Teacher Exposure for Self-Distillation (ATESD) improves LLM reasoning by dynamically adjusting how much of the reference reasoning the teacher shows the student during training, using a learnable policy controller and a discounted learning-progress reward. Experiments on math benchmarks show consistent improvements over existing self-distillation and RL baselines.

The Many Faces of On-Policy Distillation: Pitfalls, Mechanisms, and Fixes

Hugging Face Daily Papers

This paper presents a comprehensive empirical study on on-policy distillation for large language models, identifying failure mechanisms like distribution mismatch and optimization instability, and proposing fixes such as stop-gradient objectives and RLVR-adapted teachers.