@QuixiAI: I let Gemini 4 Argon try building on my compiler. He made some progress but made lots of mistakes. Fable is cleaning up…

X AI KOLs Timeline News
ai-coding compilers model-comparison gemini llm-benchmark developer-tools

Summary

A developer reports that Gemini 4 Argon made many mistakes when building on the With compiler, while Meta Muse Wonder Full completed a similar test without errors, suggesting Muse is better suited for developing the compiler.

I let Gemini 4 Argon try building on my compiler. He made some progress but made lots of mistakes. Fable is cleaning up after him now. Muse Wonder Full, under a similar test, made no mistakes. For developing the With compiler, Meta Muse Wonder Full is better than Gemini 4 https://t.co/N3muuoVS8F
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/18/26, 03:13 PM

I let Gemini 4 Argon try building on my compiler. He made some progress but made lots of mistakes. Fable is cleaning up after him now.

Muse Wonder Full, under a similar test, made no mistakes.

For developing the With compiler, Meta Muse Wonder Full is better than Gemini 4 https://t.co/N3muuoVS8F

Similar Articles

Gemini 4 Argon scores 97.5 on Arc Argi 3, waiting for Opus 5.5

Reddit r/singularity

Gemini 4 Argon reportedly scores 97.5 on the ARC-AGI-3 benchmark, essentially saturating it, prompting work on ARC-AGI 4 focused on novel idea generation and innovation — which the poster likens to an ASI-level evaluation.

Google releases Gemini 4 Argon, called its most powerful model yet

TechCrunch AI

Google launched Gemini 4 Argon, described as its most powerful model yet, specializing in defensive cybersecurity, coding, and long-horizon reasoning — rolling out to select cyber partners through its Fairwind Program while claiming top benchmark scores over OpenAI's Astra and Anthropic's Fable and Opus.