@johnschulman2: We love open weights and plan to keep releasing open-weight models and fine-tuning tools. But we’re not absolutists; mi…

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

John Schulman discusses a balanced approach to open-weight AI models, acknowledging misuse risks while committing to continued releases and calling for collaborative research on safe access.

We love open weights and plan to keep releasing open-weight models and fine-tuning tools. But we’re not absolutists; misuse risks are real. Here’s how we’re thinking about a safe path forward, and the research needed to get there. Come work on it with us.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/03/26, 01:46 PM

We love open weights and plan to keep releasing open-weight models and fine-tuning tools. But we’re not absolutists; misuse risks are real. Here’s how we’re thinking about a safe path forward, and the research needed to get there. Come work on it with us.

Thinking Machines (@thinkymachines): Releasing weights indiscriminately isn’t safe. Neither is keeping capable models inside a few labs.

We think there’s a path between them. We haven’t mapped all of it. Our new post covers the part we can see: how we assessed Inkling, and why access should widen in stages.

Similar Articles

Tradeoffs in Open-Weights Models (9 minute read)

TLDR AI

An analysis of the open-weights AI debate: proponents argue it democratizes AI, while critics cite misuse risks; major tech companies signed a letter supporting open weights, while Anthropic and parts of the Trump administration remain cautious.

Open weight progression with no frontier release

Reddit r/singularity

A software developer discusses how OpenAI and Anthropic's strategy of keeping models internal may influence open weight releases and the replication of models by Chinese companies.