Local coding agents are good now, but only if you babysit them
Summary
The author finds local coding agents useful for small tasks but requires constant supervision to prevent errors and scope creep, describing an iterative workflow of small fixes, tests, and manual diffs.
Similar Articles
Are coding agents much better at starting projects than fixing real codebases?
An observation that coding agents perform well on new projects but often struggle with existing codebases, where the need for minimal changes and understanding of hidden dependencies limits their effectiveness.
How do you monitor long-running local coding agents when you step away?
Discusses methods for monitoring long-running local coding agents when you step away from your computer.
I built a local control system for agent failures, fixes, evals, and gates to make autoresearch-style self-improvement loops work in real agent codebases
A local control system is built to manage agent improvement loops, capturing traces, finding recurring failures, drafting fixes with Codex/Claude Code, and applying changes only after passing checks and evals.
AI coding agents need a “plan first, edit later” workflow? Looking for feedback
A proposed workflow for AI coding agents that emphasizes brainstorming and boundary enforcement before code editing, seeking community feedback on its utility.
Coding with Agents
Coding with Agents explores how AI agents can assist developers in writing code, automating tasks, and improving productivity.