AdaPlanBench: Evaluating Adaptive Planning in Large Language Model Agents under World and User Constraints
Summary
AdaPlanBench is a dynamic benchmark for evaluating LLM agents' ability to adaptively plan under progressively revealed world and user constraints through multi-turn interactions, showing current models struggle especially with user constraints.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/05/26, 06:06 AM
Paper page - AdaPlanBench: Evaluating Adaptive Planning in Large Language Model Agents under World and User Constraints
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.05622
Abstract
AdaPlanBench presents a dynamic interactive benchmark for evaluating LLM agents’ ability to adaptively plan under progressively revealed world and user constraints through multi-turn interactions.
Planning for real-world problems by language models often involves both world and user constraints, which may not be fully specified upfront and are progressively disclosed through interaction. However, existing benchmarks still underexploreadaptive planningunder such progressively revealeddual constraints. To address this gap, we introduce AdaPlanBench, a dynamicinteractive benchmarkfor evaluating whetherLarge Language Model(LLM) agents can adaptively plan and re-plan under progressively revealed world and user constraints. AdaPlanBench is built on 307 household tasks, with a scalable constraint construction pipeline that augments each task withdual constraints. At runtime, agents interact with the environment in amulti-turn protocolwhere hidden constraints are revealed only when the agent proposes a plan that violates them, requiring iterativeplan revisionunder accumulating feedback. This makes planning challenging, as agents must infer and track constraints from feedback while re-planning effectively. Experiments on ten leading LLMs show thatadaptive planningunderdual constraintsremains challenging, with the best model reaching only 67.75% accuracy. We further observe that performance degrades as more constraints accumulate, with user constraints posing a particularly large challenge and failures often stemming from weakerphysical groundingand reduced effectiveness. These results establish AdaPlanBench as a testbed for dual-constrained interactive planning and highlight the challenge of reliable adaptation to dynamically revealed constraints in LLM agents.
View arXiv pageView PDFGitHubAdd to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2606\.05622
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.05622 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper1
#### JiayuJeff/AdaPlanBench Updatedabout 3 hours ago • 6 • 1
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.05622 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
PlanningBench: Generating Scalable and Verifiable Planning Data for Evaluating and Training Large Language Models
PlanningBench is a framework for generating scalable, diverse, and verifiable planning data to evaluate and train large language models, featuring a constraint-driven synthesis pipeline with adaptive difficulty control and quality filtering. Experiments show that frontier LLMs struggle with coupled constraints, and reinforcement learning on PlanningBench data improves performance on unseen planning tasks.
PlanBench-XL: Evaluating Long-Horizon Planning of LLM Tool-Use Agents in Large-Scale Tool Ecosystems
PlanBench-XL is a new benchmark that evaluates LLM agents' ability to plan and adapt in large tool ecosystems with limited visibility and dynamic disruptions. Experiments show GPT-5.4 achieves only 51.9% accuracy in block-free settings and collapses to 11.36% under severe blocking, highlighting significant challenges in long-horizon planning.
AdvPlan-Bench: Adversarial Evaluation of Structured Plan-Generation Agents
AdvPlan-Bench is an offline benchmark for adversarial evaluation of structured plan-generation agents, comparing plans with BLUE-vs-RED advantage and diagnostic metrics across 150 synthetic scenarios to study response-budget sensitivity and multi-agent critique.
APeB: Benchmarking Personalization Ability of Large Language Model Agents
Introduces APeB, a benchmark for evaluating personalization in LLM agents, focusing on inferring user intent and preferences from raw queries and interaction histories. Finds that current models struggle with early-stage queries and that history-aware refinement can help.
Beyond the Leaderboard: A Synthesis of Tool-Use, Planning, and Reasoning Failures in Large Language Model Agents
This paper synthesizes 27 benchmark, taxonomy, and audit papers from 2023-2026 into a unified taxonomy of LLM agent limitations, identifying six failure clusters including tool invocation errors, planning failures, long-horizon degradation, multi-agent coordination issues, safety concerns, and measurement validity problems.