What should an agent save so a failed run can be replayed safely?
Summary
The article discusses what data agents should save for safe replay of failed runs, distinguishing between reproducing failures and resuming after fixes, while balancing automatic retries with human intervention.
Similar Articles
Retrying a failed agent step is not the same as safely resuming a 14-step run
The article discusses the difference between retrying a failed agent step and safely resuming a multi-step run, emphasizing that they are not equivalent operations.
Your agent's retry logic dies when the agent does
The author shares lessons from putting an AI agent with write access into production, explaining that retry logic inside the agent loop fails when the process dies. They advocate for treating side-effectful tool calls as durable background jobs with idempotency keys.
How are you putting a budget on agent retries without hiding real failures?
Asks how developers budget agent retries to distinguish transient failures from persistent ones, and what signals best decide when to stop or retry in production agents.
Production agent evals should test incident replay not just task success
Discusses that production agent evaluations should include failure replay and resume capabilities, not just happy-path task success, emphasizing the need for observability that enables recovery.
How do you cap agent retries without hiding the failures that actually need a stronger model?
The article discusses strategies for capping retries in AI agents to balance cost and performance, emphasizing the need to differentiate between retryable errors and cases requiring escalation to more capable models in production.