A Matter of TASTE: Improving Coverage and Difficulty of Agent Benchmarks

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

TASTE is an automated method for generating challenging agent benchmarks with broader tool-use coverage by evolving tool sequences through adaptive contrastive n-gram modeling and iterative difficulty refinement. The resulting τ^c-Bench reveals that models nearly saturating existing benchmarks suffer severe performance drops, indicating saturation rather than robust skill.

As agent capabilities advance, existing benchmarks, such as τ^2-Bench, are becoming increasingly saturated. Yet constructing new benchmark tasks remains complex, costly, and labor-intensive. Moreover, the standard approach, in which scenarios are first written in natural language and then mapped to tool sequences, captures only a narrow subset of the tool-use patterns agents exercise. In this paper, we address these problems by reversing the task construction process. We propose TASTE: Task Synthesis from Tool Sequence Evolution, an automatic method that generates challenging tasks with broader tool-use coverage. TASTE utilizes an Adaptive Contrastive n-gram model trained on LLM-judged validity signals. This enables sampling valid tool sequences that cover a vast range of tool combinations. TASTE then selects representative sequences from the pool via clustering, instantiates them into complete benchmark tasks, and refines them through iterative difficulty evolution. Using TASTE, we construct τ^c-Bench, a challenging extension of the three domains of τ^2-Bench. We evaluate 11 agent/user LLM pairs and find that models nearly saturating τ^2-Bench suffer severe performance drops on our tasks (e.g., Gemini-3-Flash falls from 0.82!-!0.94 to 0.28!-!0.61). Beyond increasing difficulty, our generated tasks more than double the number of unique tool combinations agents must execute. Our results suggest high scores on existing benchmarks often reflect saturation rather than robust task-solving ability. By automating the generation of difficult, high-coverage benchmarks, TASTE enables continuous, scalable evaluation of future agents.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/02/26, 03:36 PM

Paper page - A Matter of TASTE: Improving Coverage and Difficulty of Agent Benchmarks

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.28556

Abstract

Automated benchmark generation method creates challenging tasks with broader tool-use coverage by evolving tool sequences through adaptive contrastive n-gram modeling and iterative difficulty refinement.

Asagent capabilitiesadvance, existing benchmarks, such as τ^2-Bench, are becoming increasingly saturated. Yet constructing new benchmark tasks remains complex, costly, and labor-intensive. Moreover, the standard approach, in which scenarios are first written in natural language and then mapped to tool sequences, captures only a narrow subset of thetool-use patternsagents exercise. In this paper, we address these problems by reversing the task construction process. We propose TASTE:Task SynthesisfromTool Sequence Evolution, an automatic method that generates challenging tasks with broader tool-use coverage. TASTE utilizes anAdaptive Contrastive n-gram modeltrained onLLM-judged validity signals. This enables sampling valid tool sequences that cover a vast range of tool combinations. TASTE then selects representative sequences from the pool viaclustering, instantiates them into complete benchmark tasks, and refines them throughiterative difficulty evolution. Using TASTE, we construct τ^c-Bench, a challenging extension of the three domains of τ^2-Bench. We evaluate 11 agent/user LLM pairs and find that models nearly saturating τ^2-Bench suffer severe performance drops on our tasks (e.g., Gemini-3-Flash falls from 0.82!-!0.94 to 0.28!-!0.61). Beyond increasing difficulty, our generated tasks more than double the number of unique tool combinations agents must execute. Our results suggest high scores on existing benchmarks often reflect saturation rather than robust task-solving ability. By automating the generation of difficult, high-coverage benchmarks, TASTE enables continuous, scalable evaluation of future agents.

View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub1Add to collection

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.28556 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.28556 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.28556 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper1

Similar Articles

Life After Benchmark Saturation: A Case Study of CORE-Bench

arXiv cs.AI

This paper argues against the 'retire-and-replace' approach to saturated benchmarks, using CORE-Bench as a case study to demonstrate that measuring agent performance along dimensions such as construct validity, efficiency, reliability, and human-agent collaboration yields meaningful insights even after accuracy plateaus.

TUA-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Terminal-Use Agents

Hugging Face Daily Papers

TUA-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating general-purpose terminal-use agents across diverse digital activities and specialized workflows, revealing significant performance gaps among current frontier agents.