A Matter of TASTE: Improving Coverage and Difficulty of Agent Benchmarks
Summary
TASTE is an automated method for generating challenging agent benchmarks with broader tool-use coverage by evolving tool sequences through adaptive contrastive n-gram modeling and iterative difficulty refinement. The resulting τ^c-Bench reveals that models nearly saturating existing benchmarks suffer severe performance drops, indicating saturation rather than robust skill.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/02/26, 03:36 PM
Paper page - A Matter of TASTE: Improving Coverage and Difficulty of Agent Benchmarks
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.28556
Abstract
Automated benchmark generation method creates challenging tasks with broader tool-use coverage by evolving tool sequences through adaptive contrastive n-gram modeling and iterative difficulty refinement.
Asagent capabilitiesadvance, existing benchmarks, such as τ^2-Bench, are becoming increasingly saturated. Yet constructing new benchmark tasks remains complex, costly, and labor-intensive. Moreover, the standard approach, in which scenarios are first written in natural language and then mapped to tool sequences, captures only a narrow subset of thetool-use patternsagents exercise. In this paper, we address these problems by reversing the task construction process. We propose TASTE:Task SynthesisfromTool Sequence Evolution, an automatic method that generates challenging tasks with broader tool-use coverage. TASTE utilizes anAdaptive Contrastive n-gram modeltrained onLLM-judged validity signals. This enables sampling valid tool sequences that cover a vast range of tool combinations. TASTE then selects representative sequences from the pool viaclustering, instantiates them into complete benchmark tasks, and refines them throughiterative difficulty evolution. Using TASTE, we construct τ^c-Bench, a challenging extension of the three domains of τ^2-Bench. We evaluate 11 agent/user LLM pairs and find that models nearly saturating τ^2-Bench suffer severe performance drops on our tasks (e.g., Gemini-3-Flash falls from 0.82!-!0.94 to 0.28!-!0.61). Beyond increasing difficulty, our generated tasks more than double the number of unique tool combinations agents must execute. Our results suggest high scores on existing benchmarks often reflect saturation rather than robust task-solving ability. By automating the generation of difficult, high-coverage benchmarks, TASTE enables continuous, scalable evaluation of future agents.
View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub1Add to collection
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.28556 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.28556 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.28556 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper1
Similar Articles
Beyond Function Calling: Benchmarking Tool-Using Agents under Tool-Environment Unreliability
Introduces ToolBench-X, a benchmark for evaluating large language model agents under various tool-environment reliability hazards, revealing a substantial gap in performance compared to clean environments.
TensorBench: Benchmarking Coding Agents on a Compiler-Based Tensor Framework
TensorBench is a benchmark of 199 feature-addition and refactoring tasks on a compiler-based tensor framework, evaluating seven coding agents with pass rates ranging from 22.1% to 64.8%.
TOBench: A Task-Oriented Omni-Modal Benchmark for Real-World Tool-Using Agents
TOBench is a new benchmark for evaluating AI agents on real-world, task-oriented tool use with multimodal inputs and closed-loop verification. Experiments show top models like Qwen 3.5 Plus achieve only 41% success, far below the 94% human benchmark, highlighting a significant gap.
Life After Benchmark Saturation: A Case Study of CORE-Bench
This paper argues against the 'retire-and-replace' approach to saturated benchmarks, using CORE-Bench as a case study to demonstrate that measuring agent performance along dimensions such as construct validity, efficiency, reliability, and human-agent collaboration yields meaningful insights even after accuracy plateaus.
TUA-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Terminal-Use Agents
TUA-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating general-purpose terminal-use agents across diverse digital activities and specialized workflows, revealing significant performance gaps among current frontier agents.