What if AI could keep working inside the experience it created.. and then you entered that creation as a character.. without re-running any code?
Summary
AskSary LiveLoop enables AI to continuously create and modify interactive experiences without re-running code, allowing users to queue instructions and persist state across sessions.
Similar Articles
@jasonzhou1993: https://x.com/jasonzhou1993/status/2067937943545897143
Loop engineering is the practice of designing systems where AI agents autonomously decide what to work on, execute, and iterate, going beyond manual prompting by building outer loops that compound across different domains. The article explains the two-layer agent harness and how sharing artifacts between loops creates compounding learning.
@mvanhorn: https://x.com/mvanhorn/status/2063865685558903149
The article explains the concept of 'loops' in AI coding, where developers write programs that prompt coding agents instead of manually prompting, as popularized by Peter Steinberger and Boris Cherny, and discusses how this shift represents a new abstraction layer in AI-assisted development.
Addy Osmani (@addyosmani) on X
Loop engineering is a new approach to working with AI coding agents where you design automated loops that prompt and manage agents instead of prompting them directly. The concept involves five building blocks—automations, worktrees, skills, plugins, and sub-agents—plus external memory, and is already implemented in tools like Claude Code and Codex.
@s4yonnara: https://x.com/s4yonnara/status/2070797048471756948
A guide on building autonomous loops for AI coding agents, explaining how to design systems that allow agents to run tasks repeatedly without manual intervention, with conditions for when loops are worth it and how to build them safely.
Is this machine playing?
MIT researchers placed an AI coding assistant as the mind of a virtual body on a digital island with no specified task or reward, and observed that across thirteen 30-hour runs the agents spontaneously engaged in play-like behaviors—climbing, building towers, drawing mandalas, and running physics experiments. The paper examines whether this behavior meets classical criteria for play and whether play could become a mode of machine development.