Managing Procedural Memory in LLM Agents: Control, Adaptation, and Evaluation
Summary
Introduces AFTER, a benchmark of 382 enterprise tasks to evaluate procedural memory in LLM agents, showing that skill transfer improves performance across tasks, roles, and model backbones, with some skills generalizing broadly while others specialize.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/01/26, 11:42 AM
Paper page - Managing Procedural Memory in LLM Agents: Control, Adaptation, and Evaluation
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.23127
Abstract
Procedural memory enhances LLM agents on workplace tasks through skill transfer across roles and models, with varying generalization capabilities affecting deployment strategies.
Procedural memoryis increasingly used to improveLLM agentson recurring workplace tasks, yet its ability to produce reusable skills remains poorly understood. We introduce AFTER, a benchmark of 382 realisticenterprise tasksspanning six professional roles and 22procedural skills, designed to evaluate how skills transfer across tasks, roles, and model backbones. The benchmark includes controlled evaluation settings for local improvement,cross-task transfer,cross-role transfer, andcross-model generalization. Experiments show thatprocedural memorydelivers consistent gains in industrial workflows: a single refinement round improvesaggregate performanceby 3.7-6.7 points, while skills evolved from diversemulti-model execution tracesachieve 73.1% cross-model test accuracy, outperforming all single-model trace sources. We further find that some skills generalize broadly across tasks and models, whereas others become specialized to role-specific workflows and lose effectiveness under transfer. These results provide practical guidance for building, evaluating, and deployingprocedural memorysystems in production agent platforms.
View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub1Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2606\.23127
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.23127 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper1
#### DavydenkoGr/AFTER Updated1 day ago • 1.01k • 2
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.23127 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
AdMem: Advanced Memory for Task-solving Agents
This paper introduces AdMem, a unified memory framework for LLM-based agents that integrates semantic, episodic, and procedural memory with a bi-level short-term and long-term store, using a multi-agent architecture for automatic memory generation and adaptive retrieval. Experiments show improved robustness and success on long multi-turn tasks.
Your agent's memory remembers everything except how to do its job
An analysis of the gap between episodic and procedural memory in LLM agents, citing a new paper (Memp) from Zhejiang University and Alibaba that builds procedural memory from agent trajectories and uses failure signals to revise stored procedures.
From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms
This survey paper proposes an evolutionary framework for LLM agent memory mechanisms, categorizing their development into three stages: storage, reflection, and experience. It analyzes core drivers such as long-range consistency and continual learning to provide design principles for next-generation agents.
From Memory to Skills: Evidence-Grounded Co-Evolution Governance for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
MSCE is a training-free framework that organizes LLM agent experience into three memory levels and converts them into reusable skills with evidence links, outperforming existing memory and skill-augmented baselines.
Filesystem-Based Memory for LLM Agents: Organization, Evolution, and Sustainability
This paper presents the first systematic exploration of filesystem-based memory for LLM agents, formalizing roles of management, search, and execution agents around a shared memory store. It finds that organization primarily reduces retrieval cost but does not yet improve answer quality, and that tooling choices affect store shape as much as model selection.