YOLO-PEFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning on YOLO Family
Summary
YOLO-PEFT is a structure-aware framework that formulates adapter placement as constraint planning for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of YOLO detectors, achieving better mAP than full fine-tuning with reduced memory.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/10/26, 06:13 AM
Paper page - YOLO-PEFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning on YOLO Family
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.07051
Abstract
Genericparameter-efficientfine-tuning(PEFT)methodstransferredfromlanguagemodelscanfailsilentlyonreal-timedetectors,whoseheterogeneousoperatorsanddetection-specificcomponentsimposeplacementconstraintsabsentfromregularTransformerstacks.WeproposeYOLO-PEFT,astructure-awareframeworkthatformulatesadapterplacementasanauditableconstraint-planningproblem.Givenadetectorgraph,aPEFTrequest,andaresourcebudget,YOLO-PEFTassignsoperatorandsemanticroles,evaluatesexplicitoperator-validity,detector-semantic,graph-interface,anddeploymentpredicates,recordsareasoncodeforeachexcludedmodule,andeitheremitsabudgetedtarget-moduleplanorreturnsRefusebeforetraining.UndertheofficialVOC07+12trainval-to-VOC07testprotocol,planner-selectedRS-LoRAreaches0.7138and0.7307mAP50-95onYOLO11sandYOLO12s,respectively,comparedwith0.6428and0.6662forFull-SFT.OnRT-DETR-L,allsevenevaluatedLoRA-familyconfigurationscrossthepredefinedcatastrophicthreshold,supportingacalibratedRefuse-to-Full-SFTdecisionwithintheevaluatedcoverage.AcontrolledYOLO11auditfurthershowsthatLoRAreducespeaktrainingmemoryby43.9percent,althoughtrainingtakes1.72timeslonger.Withintheevaluateddetectorfamilies,placementpolicies,andcalibrationcoverage,YOLO-PEFTreplacesmanualtarget-moduletrialanderrorwithexplicit,inspectableplanningwhilepreservingverifiedtrain-save-merge-exportpaths;refusalonunseendetectorarchitecturesremainsanopenvalidationproblem.ProjectPage:github.com/Tencent/YOLO-Master
View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2608\.07051
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.07051 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.07051 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.07051 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
@HuggingPapers: YOLO-PEFT Tencent researchers propose a structure-aware framework that turns adapter placement into auditable constrain…
Tencent researchers propose YOLO-PEFT, a structure-aware framework that treats adapter placement as constraint planning, outperforming full fine-tuning on YOLO detectors while using significantly fewer trainable parameters.
ShadowPEFT: Shadow Network for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
ShadowPEFT introduces a centralized parameter-efficient fine-tuning method that uses a depth-shared shadow module to refine transformer layer representations, matching or outperforming LoRA/DoRA with comparable trainable parameters.
Beyond LoRA: Can you beat the most popular fine-tuning technique?
Explores whether LoRA is the best parameter-efficient fine-tuning technique and introduces the PEFT library's tools to compare methods.
On the Scaling of PEFT: Towards Million Personal Models of Trillion Parameters
This paper explores using parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) as a compact substrate for persistent personal models, studying scaling up, down, and out, and introduces MinT for managing adapters.
Energy- and Memory-Efficient PEFT Methods for Personalized On-Device SLMs on Consumer GPUs
The paper compares five parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods on four small language models for on-device personalization, finding LoRA+ best for energy efficiency and QLoRA best for memory-limited deployment.