DFAH-Bench: Benchmarking Observable Agent Instability in Financial Decision-Making
Summary
Introduces DFAH-Bench, a replay benchmark to measure behavioral instability in financial agent decision-making, finding that outcome agreement alone misses significant trajectory divergence.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/24/26, 05:02 AM
# DFAH-Bench: Benchmarking Observable Agent Instability in Financial Decision-Making Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20491](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20491) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.20491) > Abstract:Standard evaluation benchmarks measure what a tool\-using agent decides, not whether it arrives at that decision through the same process each time\. We introduce DFAH\-Bench, a replay benchmark that measures observable behavioral instability in financial agent decision\-making across three channels \-\- tool\-call trajectories, evidence contacts, and decision concentration \-\- none of which require access to hidden reasoning text\. Across 8,127 replay episodes spanning 10 models and 3 financial tasks, we find that outcome agreement alone is an incomplete stability signal: frontier models can agree on decisions 95% of the time while following the same tool path only 77% of the time \-\- an 18\-percentage\-point gap \(95% CI: \[0\.14, 0\.22\]\) that outcome\-only evaluation misses entirely\. Among frontier\-model case groups with high decision agreement, over 55% exhibit meaningful trajectory divergence\. We identify three behavioral profiles: pattern matchers that achieve near\-perfect agreement by collapsing to a single output regardless of input, stable executors with relatively consistent tool\-use processes, and trajectory divergers that reach the same conclusions through materially different tool paths and evidence contacts\. The benchmark code, metric scripts, replay logs, benchmark card, dataset README, and release manifest are released in the accompanying repository\. ## Submission history From: Raffi Khatchadourian \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/8855438b/2607.20491)\] **\[v1\]**Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:31:09 UTC \(67 KB\)
Similar Articles
FinPersona-Bench: A Benchmark for Longitudinal Psychometric Stability of Autonomous Financial Agents
Introduces FinPersona-Bench, a benchmark to measure how well autonomous financial agents maintain their assigned behavioral mandates over time, revealing Mandate Salience Decay (MSD) that worsens with temporal distance and varies by model and agent profile.
FM-Bench: A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Management with Competing Agents
FM-Bench is a new benchmark for evaluating long-horizon decision-making of LLM agents managing a football club over 20 years, revealing that managerial behavior drives performance more than model scale or token spend.
DecisionBench: A Benchmark for Emergent Delegation in Long-Horizon Agentic Workflows
DecisionBench introduces a standardized benchmark for evaluating emergent delegation in long-horizon multi-agent workflows, providing a substrate with task suites, peer models, and multi-axis metrics to isolate orchestration capabilities.
BehaviorBench: Modeling Real-World User Decisions from Behavioral Traces
BehaviorBench is a benchmark for evaluating personalized decision modeling from real-world behavioral traces, using prediction-market and on-chain records to test belief and trade prediction tasks.
LongDS-Bench: On the Failure of Long-Horizon Agentic Data Analysis
Introduces LongDS, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on long-horizon, multi-turn data analysis tasks. Evaluations show that even the best models achieve only 48.45% accuracy, with performance dropping sharply over turns, highlighting that maintaining analytical state is the key bottleneck.