DFAH-Bench: Benchmarking Observable Agent Instability in Financial Decision-Making

arXiv cs.AI Papers

Summary

Introduces DFAH-Bench, a replay benchmark to measure behavioral instability in financial agent decision-making, finding that outcome agreement alone misses significant trajectory divergence.

arXiv:2607.20491v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Standard evaluation benchmarks measure what a tool-using agent decides, not whether it arrives at that decision through the same process each time. We introduce DFAH-Bench, a replay benchmark that measures observable behavioral instability in financial agent decision-making across three channels -- tool-call trajectories, evidence contacts, and decision concentration -- none of which require access to hidden reasoning text. Across 8,127 replay episodes spanning 10 models and 3 financial tasks, we find that outcome agreement alone is an incomplete stability signal: frontier models can agree on decisions 95% of the time while following the same tool path only 77% of the time -- an 18-percentage-point gap (95% CI: [0.14, 0.22]) that outcome-only evaluation misses entirely. Among frontier-model case groups with high decision agreement, over 55% exhibit meaningful trajectory divergence. We identify three behavioral profiles: pattern matchers that achieve near-perfect agreement by collapsing to a single output regardless of input, stable executors with relatively consistent tool-use processes, and trajectory divergers that reach the same conclusions through materially different tool paths and evidence contacts. The benchmark code, metric scripts, replay logs, benchmark card, dataset README, and release manifest are released in the accompanying repository.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/24/26, 05:02 AM

# DFAH-Bench: Benchmarking Observable Agent Instability in Financial Decision-Making
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20491](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20491)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.20491)

> Abstract:Standard evaluation benchmarks measure what a tool\-using agent decides, not whether it arrives at that decision through the same process each time\. We introduce DFAH\-Bench, a replay benchmark that measures observable behavioral instability in financial agent decision\-making across three channels \-\- tool\-call trajectories, evidence contacts, and decision concentration \-\- none of which require access to hidden reasoning text\. Across 8,127 replay episodes spanning 10 models and 3 financial tasks, we find that outcome agreement alone is an incomplete stability signal: frontier models can agree on decisions 95% of the time while following the same tool path only 77% of the time \-\- an 18\-percentage\-point gap \(95% CI: \[0\.14, 0\.22\]\) that outcome\-only evaluation misses entirely\. Among frontier\-model case groups with high decision agreement, over 55% exhibit meaningful trajectory divergence\. We identify three behavioral profiles: pattern matchers that achieve near\-perfect agreement by collapsing to a single output regardless of input, stable executors with relatively consistent tool\-use processes, and trajectory divergers that reach the same conclusions through materially different tool paths and evidence contacts\. The benchmark code, metric scripts, replay logs, benchmark card, dataset README, and release manifest are released in the accompanying repository\.

## Submission history

From: Raffi Khatchadourian \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/8855438b/2607.20491)\] **\[v1\]**Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:31:09 UTC \(67 KB\)

Similar Articles

LongDS-Bench: On the Failure of Long-Horizon Agentic Data Analysis

arXiv cs.LG

Introduces LongDS, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on long-horizon, multi-turn data analysis tasks. Evaluations show that even the best models achieve only 48.45% accuracy, with performance dropping sharply over turns, highlighting that maintaining analytical state is the key bottleneck.