It's impossible to test your own agent. I tried and failed.
Summary
A developer's personal account of the difficulty in objectively evaluating their own AI agent's performance, highlighting the pitfalls of self-testing and the value of unexpected, real-world benchmarks.
Similar Articles
What your agent's green test suite actually proves
This article argues that standard test suites with fixed inputs and expected outputs are insufficient for AI agents due to infinite input spaces and non-deterministic behavior, advocating for property-based testing instead.
An Empirical Study of Automating Agent Evaluation
This paper introduces EvalAgent, a system that automates the evaluation of AI agents by encoding domain-specific expertise, addressing the limitations of standard coding assistants in this task. It also presents AgentEvalBench, a benchmark for testing evaluation pipelines, and demonstrates significant improvements in evaluation reliability.
How are you testing your agents before deploying? Or is everyone just vibes-checking in prod?
A discussion on the challenges of testing non-deterministic AI agents, questioning how developers validate tool usage, behavior, and multi-step workflows without traditional testing patterns.
I keep abandoning multi-agent setups because I can't verify the code they ship. How are you handling this?
A developer shares their frustration with multi-agent coding setups where verifying the output of parallel PRs is impractical, and describes building an AI QA agent that uses a real browser (via Browserbase) to automatically click through preview deploys and fail PRs that don't work as expected.
I'm building a tool to stop manually chatting with your own AI agent to test it, would you use it?
The author is building a tool to automatically test AI agents by simulating realistic user conversations and providing pass/fail reports, saving developers from manual testing.