It's impossible to test your own agent. I tried and failed.
Summary
A developer's personal account of the difficulty in objectively evaluating their own AI agent's performance, highlighting the pitfalls of self-testing and the value of unexpected, real-world benchmarks.
Similar Articles
Everyone says write evals for your agent. But what should you actually test?
A practical guide on writing effective evaluations for AI agents, focusing on starting from observed failures and using a mix of deterministic checks and LLM judges.
Looking for extreme / impossible tasks to properly stress-test my agent.I can’t trust my own judgment anymore
A developer who built a fully autonomous custom agent architecture that can run for weeks without intervention is asking the community for extreme, adversarial tasks to properly stress-test it, because they can no longer trust their own judgment.
Your AI Agent Scores Well on Benchmarks. So Why Does It Still Fail in Production?
The article discusses the benchmark reality gap in AI agents, where high benchmark scores do not guarantee reliable performance in real-world production environments, emphasizing the need for better evaluation metrics.
when your agent eval catches a failure what do u actually do next?
The author discusses common challenges in debugging AI agent evaluation failures, seeking insights on efficient investigation methods and the reliability of comparison runs versus other evidence sources.
Best patterns for evaluating AI agents?
A practitioner shares their deterministic evaluation harness for QA/coding agents — fixed corpora, injected bugs, hidden tests, and pass^k/token metrics — and asks the community how others balance smoke tests vs full benchmarks, whether LLM-as-a-judge adds value, and whether tools like Promptfoo or DeepEval reduce maintenance burden.