@moraes_c_: drowning in low-quality PRs? we're giving maintainers the power to set contribution limits, starting with a PR cap for …
Summary
This tweet announces a new feature that empowers open-source maintainers to set contribution limits, including a PR cap for external contributors and an allowlist for trusted ones, to reduce low-quality pull requests.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/23/26, 02:07 PM
drowning in low-quality PRs?
we’re giving maintainers the power to set contribution limits, starting with a PR cap for outside contributors and an allowlist for your trusted ones.
sneak peek below 👇 https://t.co/yiuPmuBrJ1
Similar Articles
@github: Pull requests are easier to open than ever, but every review still takes human effort. Introducing pull request limits:…
GitHub introduces pull request limits, allowing maintainers to cap open PRs from contributors without write access, with a bypass list for trusted contributors.
I don't want your PRs anymore
An open-source maintainer explains why they now prefer LLM-generated code over community PRs, arguing that AI assistance reduces risk and friction while shifting the value of contributions toward feedback, bug reports, and design discussions.
@dabit3: Super interesting story that shows how the current state of @github is unable to protect open source maintainers from A…
A story detailing how AI bots overwhelmed a GitHub repository with spam comments and untested PRs after a $900 bounty was posted, forcing maintainers to implement workarounds like contributor whitelists and reputation bots, highlighting GitHub's lack of anti-bot mechanisms.
The Maintainer's Dilemma
A blog post exploring the challenges faced by open-source maintainers, including backlog of pull requests, the impact of AI tools on code review, and the dilemma of balancing quality with burnout.
@cursor_ai: Developers are using agents to write more "mega PRs."
Developers are increasingly using AI agents to generate larger pull requests, known as 'mega PRs.'