Terminal Bench v4 scores
Summary
Terminal Bench v4 scores show GLM-5.3 leading among open models, with GLM-5.3-Flash topping flash models, and Kimi-K3 underperforming, as the benchmark is considered by some to better reflect model intelligence.
Similar Articles
Terminal Bench 4.0 just dropped, GLM-5.3 is at the same level as Fable 5, accounting for margin of error
Terminal Bench 4.0 has been released, comparing AI models like GLM-5.3 and Fable 5, with a focus on rapid iteration to combat benchmark saturation and raising questions about cost-effective alternatives for evaluating coding agents.
@cline: GLM-5.3 (max) outperforms GPT-5.6 Sol (max) on the new Terminal-Bench 4.0. Incredible seeing open weights compete with …
GLM-5.3 (max) outperforms GPT-5.6 Sol (max) on Terminal-Bench 4.0, highlighting the competitiveness of open-weight AI models, with Cline promoted for discounted access.
GLM 5.3 Flash (Ox Alpha) benchmark comparisons
The article discusses benchmark comparisons for the GLM-5.3-Flash model, highlighting its frontier intelligence and cost efficiency from a release blog post.
I tested GLM-5.3, DeepSeek V4 Pro/Flash, Gemini 3.7 Flash on real-world production tasks.
The article compares the real-world performance of GLM-5.3, DeepSeek V4 Pro/Flash, and Gemini 3.7 Flash, recommending Kimi K3 for complex tasks, DeepSeek V4 Flash for general use, and others for specific roles like cybersecurity.
GLM-5.2 is the first open-weights model to cross 80% on Terminal-Bench and beats every other open model available
GLM-5.2 is the first open-weights model to exceed 80% on Terminal-Bench, surpassing all other open models and even Gemini, making it a frontier-level model at a fraction of the cost.