Security Assessment of DeepSeek Harness with A.I.G: Evaluating Resistance to Indirect Prompt Injection

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

This paper evaluates indirect prompt injection risks in DeepSeek Harness using AI-Infra-Guard for controlled testing, finding notable attack success rates and recommending security controls.

We assess indirect prompt injection in DeepSeek Harness (DSH), using AI-Infra-Guard (A.I.G) to construct tests, deliver controlled taint, execute DSH, collect traces, and judge outcomes. The study covers 14,560 controlled executions over 16 indirect-content channels, text and file carrier modes, 35 payload objectives, one unmodified baseline, and 12 attack methods. The experiment preserves DSH's agent loop, tool registry, model adapter, and session-event path; source tools and sensitive sinks are local fixtures, so attempted actions are recorded without external side effects. We evaluate each trace with a deterministic rule-based judge, (RuleJudge), and a semantic LLM-based judge, (LLMJudge). The strongest observed attack success rates are 17.0% under for fake-completion attack in text mode, 25.5% under for hidden Unicode in file mode, and 16.0% under for the skills channel in file mode. also assigns partial compliance more often than (7.3% versus 2.0%). We relate these results to DSH's treatment of tool results, additional contexts, and tool-call policy hooks, then identify controls that should sit between untrusted content and sensitive actions. Our code is available at https://github.com/Tencent/AI-Infra-Guard/tree/main/Research/deepseek-harness-security-assessment .
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/19/26, 03:57 AM

Paper page - Security Assessment of DeepSeek Harness with A.I.G: Evaluating Resistance to Indirect Prompt Injection

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.16393

Abstract

Researchers evaluate indirect prompt injection risks in DeepSeek Harness using controlled taint and dual judges, finding notable success rates across text and file channels and recommending controls between untrusted content and sensitive actions.

We assessindirect prompt injectioninDeepSeek Harness(DSH), usingAI-Infra-Guard(A.I.G) to construct tests, deliver controlled taint, execute DSH, collect traces, and judge outcomes. The study covers 14,560 controlled executions over 16 indirect-content channels, text and file carrier modes, 35 payload objectives, one unmodified baseline, and 12 attack methods. The experiment preserves DSH’sagent loop,tool registry,model adapter, andsession-event path; source tools and sensitive sinks are local fixtures, so attempted actions are recorded without external side effects. We evaluate each trace with a deterministicrule-based judge, (RuleJudge), and a semanticLLM-based judge, (LLMJudge). The strongest observed attack success rates are 17.0% under forfake-completion attackin text mode, 25.5% under forhidden Unicodein file mode, and 16.0% under for theskills channelin file mode. also assigns partial compliance more often than (7.3% versus 2.0%). We relate these results to DSH’s treatment of tool results, additional contexts, andtool-call policy hooks, then identify controls that should sit between untrusted content and sensitive actions. Our code is available at https://github.com/Tencent/AI-Infra-Guard/tree/main/Research/deepseek-harness-security-assessment .

View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608\.16393

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.16393 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.16393 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.16393 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

Understanding prompt injections: a frontier security challenge

OpenAI Blog

OpenAI publishes guidance on prompt injection attacks, a social engineering vulnerability where malicious instructions hidden in web content or documents can trick AI models into unintended actions. The company outlines its multi-layered defense strategy including instruction hierarchy research, automated red-teaming, and AI-powered monitoring systems.

DeepSeek Harness

Hacker News Top

DeepSeek AI open-sources DeepSeek Harness (dsh), an agent harness with a plugin-based architecture powered by Cordis, currently in developer preview with breaking changes expected.

Insights on Indirect Prompt Injection (12 minute read)

TLDR AI

Zico Kolter and Matt Fredrikson, leaders at Gray Swan and experts in AI security, discuss the state of AI red-teaming and indirect prompt injection, a critical vulnerability for AI agents. They explain why AI security requires a different mindset, how automated red-teaming can beat humans, and introduce tools like Shade for adversarial testing.

How are you detecting new prompt injection patterns after launch?

Reddit r/AI_Agents

The article discusses methods for detecting new prompt injection patterns in AI systems after launch, including semantic search, trace-level safety scores, and tools like Braintrust, while highlighting challenges with false positives and attack taxonomy.

DeepSeek Harness is Insanely Good

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

DeepSeek Harness is an AI tool praised for its easy setup, flexible webUI, and seamless integration with services like SimpleX for E2EE and TOR messaging, offering an unopinionated design that simplifies customization without technical barriers.