LLM-as-Jev: LLMs Are Already Jev-Style Decision Models -- When and How to Fine-Tune Them
Summary
The paper introduces LLM-as-Jev, an architecture-preserving framework that extracts calibrated decision distributions from LLM next-token probabilities, and shows modern LLMs are already effective Jev-style decision models, with fine-tuning giving targeted gains on weaker models and specific tasks while KL anchors prevent conversational degradation.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/06/26, 08:57 PM
Paper page - LLM-as-Jev: LLMs Are Already Jev-Style Decision Models – When and How to Fine-Tune Them
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.02076
Abstract
Jev-styledecisionmodelsreturncategoricalprobabilitydistributionsoverpredefinedoptionswithoutgeneratingfree-formtext,enablingsoftwaresystemstoactontheiroutputsdirectly.Inthiswork,weinvestigatetheextenttowhichgeneral-purposeLLMsalreadypossessthiscapabilityoutofthebox,andwhenfine-tuningisactuallynecessary.WepresentLLM-as-Jev,anarchitecture-preservingframeworkthatextractscalibrateddecisionsdirectlyfromnext-tokenprobabilitiesoverbracketednumericidentifiers.LLM-as-Jevprovidesbothatraining-freeinferencerecipeandafine-tuningobjectivethatoptimizescandidateselectionviaatree-factorizedlistwiselosswhileanchoringauxiliarypredictionstothebasemodelusingKLdivergencepenalties.EvaluatingonQwen3.5-4BandQwen3-0.6B,wefindthatmodernLLMsareinherentlyeffectivedecisionmodels:withouttraining,the4BmodelmatchescommunityJev-stylemodelsbuiltonthesamebackbone,outperformsletter-logitreadouts,supportsarbitraryoptioncounts,andnativelyhandlesmultimodaldecisionsoverimages.Fine-tuningprovidestargetedratherthanuniversalbenefits--substantiallyimprovingweakermodelsandspecifictasks(suchasmany-optionintentrouting),butofferingdiminishingreturnsforstrongbackbones.Crucially,ourKLanchorspreventbehavioraldegradationinconversationaltextgeneration,withLoRAdeliveringthestrongestperformanceoncapablemodels.
View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610\.02076
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.02076 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.02076 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.02076 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
@NFT_Chen: Awesome! Instantly transform any LLM into a Jev model with a localized decision engine! LLM2Jev brings Jev's unified Ch…
LLM2Jev is an open-source tool that adapts local HuggingFace models to perform structured decisions with Choice, Score, and Noul frameworks, offering prefill-only inference and integration with Transformers and SGLang.
Jev isn't an LLM killer, and it isn't just a classifier. We put it in production with real users. Here's what we learned
The article shares production insights on using Jev, a semantic decision engine, to enhance AI agent systems by handling routine decisions efficiently alongside LLMs, without replacing generative models.
Decision models like Jev don't beat LLM-as-a-judge or traditional classifiers
A Red Hat Developer article benchmarks TypeSafe AI's Jev "System One" decision models against LLM-as-a-judge guardrails and traditional zero-shot text classifiers, concluding that decision models don't clearly outperform the established alternatives despite their schema-safe, low-latency, zero-shot benefits.
JEV-as-a-Judge: Accept When Confident, Escalate When Unsure
This paper introduces JEV-as-a-Judge, a cost-effective evaluation method for LLMs that uses a decision-only judge with confidence thresholds to accept certain verdicts and escalate uncertain ones, achieving comparable accuracy to state-of-the-art models at significantly lower cost.
@akshay_pachaar: LLMs vs. Jev, clearly explained! TL;DR The key difference is not that Jev generates faster. Jev does not generate text …
The article explains the key differences between LLMs and Jev, highlighting that Jev evaluates predefined decisions in parallel with probabilities, unlike LLMs that generate text sequentially.