@yadong_xie: Two years ago I was very pessimistic about the application layer, but after observing the products that actually emerged over the past two years, my view has changed. When cameras appeared, people thought painters would be replaced. But painters didn't disappear; photographers became a new profession. However, for most people, knowing how to press the shutter neither makes them replace painters nor...
Summary
The poster shares a shift in perspective on the AI application layer, using the analogy of cameras and painters to illustrate that agents do not automatically confer system design, product judgment, or other abilities. Output becomes cheaper, but good products do not automatically increase.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/23/26, 08:02 AM
Two years ago, I was very pessimistic about the application layer, but after observing a batch of products that have actually taken off over the past two years, my view has changed.
When the camera came along, people thought painters would be replaced. It turned out painters didn’t disappear, and photographers became a new profession.
But for the vast majority of people, being able to press the shutter doesn’t enable them to replace painters, nor to become photographers.
Agents won’t automatically grant people system design, product judgment, engineering quality control, or aesthetic judgment.
Output will get cheaper, but good products won’t automatically become more abundant.
Similar Articles
@Xudong07452910: This paper makes me feel that our discussion about "AI will replace programmers" might be completely misguided. The core point: The emergence of AI Agents is not about making software engineers more efficient, but about making the very act of "permanently encoding decision logic into software" increasingly unnecessary. The author describes a more fundamental paradigm shift: tra...
This paper argues that the emergence of AI Agents is not about making programmers more efficient, but fundamentally changes the nature of the software paradigm — code transforms from static artifacts that permanently solidify decision logic into temporary tools dynamically generated by LLMs and discarded after use; the core of software engineering will shift towards designing reliable inference constraint boundaries.
@yadong_xie: In just one year we’ve gone from AI-assisted coding to AI-controlled rendering—the world has hit a 100× fast-forward button
Chinese developer @yadong_xie notes that within a single year AI has shifted from merely helping write code to fully taking over rendering, calling global tech progress a 100× speed-up.
@interjc: AI video generation has now reached such a high level that aesthetic sense and imagination are the truly valuable assets.
The article comments on how AI video generation technology has reached an extremely high level, highlighting that aesthetics and imagination have become the new key values.
@FinanceYF5: The biggest shift in visual AI is not better pixels — but that top tools have stopped generating 'final outputs' and instead generate the 'source code' behind them. a16z partner Yoko Li: The most worthwhile visual AI analysis on Xiaohongshu
A major shift has occurred in the visual AI field: top tools no longer directly generate final outputs, but instead generate the source code behind them. a16z partner Yoko Li has provided an in-depth analysis of this.
@LuoSays: Actually, this argument works the other way too: right now is exactly the best entrepreneurial opportunity for ordinary people. Here's why: 1. AI has completely demolished the technical barriers of any product. If you want to make something, you can do it with AI. You can easily clone any product you want, something that was very difficult in the past. 2. With the rise of v…
The author believes that AI has broken down technical barriers and lowered the entrepreneurial threshold, making now the best entrepreneurial opportunity for ordinary people. They can quickly realize product ideas and occupy niche markets through AI.