I spent a while trying to get an LLM to make a podcast that's actually listenable. The hard part wasn't the model.

Reddit r/artificial Tools
llm podcast-generation ai-audio conversational-ai constraints editing

Summary

A developer shares techniques for making LLM-generated podcasts sound natural, including using constraints to force disagreement and pre-editing content before generation.

I wanted to know if an LLM could generate a podcast I'd actually choose to listen to — turning Hacker News threads into audio, in my case. Turns out writing the script is the easy 20%. The rest is fighting everything the model wants to do by default. Two things made the biggest difference: 1. Constraints beat instructions. Telling a model "be conversational" does nothing. What worked was giving the two hosts different information — one only read the article, the other only read the comments. They literally can't agree, because they have different facts, so they argue instead of politely nodding along. That single constraint did more than any amount of "sound natural" prompting. 2. Edit before generating. Dump a whole comment thread in and the model weights every comment equally — you get meeting minutes. Adding a cheap "producer" model that first decides what the episode is about and picks the few comments worth discussing, before the main model writes, was the biggest quality jump. Some genuinely funny failures too: it read "API" as "appy," said "one thousand two hundred and four" for 1,204, and when I put "[sigh]" in the script hoping for a bit of humanity, the voice just read the word "sigh" out loud, deadpan. Full write-up with audio samples: https://hnlisten.app/blog/i-told-the-ai-to-sigh Curious if others doing AI-generated audio/dialogue have found tricks for the "make it sound less like an essay" problem — especially forcing genuine disagreement.
Original Article

Similar Articles

How Hypocritical Is Your LLM judge? Listener-Speaker Asymmetries in the Pragmatic Competence of Large Language Models

arXiv cs.CL

This paper investigates asymmetries in LLMs' pragmatic competence by comparing their performance as judges of linguistic appropriateness versus as generators of pragmatically appropriate language. The study finds that many models perform substantially better as pragmatic listeners than as speakers, suggesting misalignment between evaluation and generation capabilities.

LLMs for automatic annotation of Mandarin narrative transcripts

arXiv cs.CL

This paper evaluates LLMs for automatically annotating narrative macrostructure in spoken Mandarin, finding that the best model achieves near-human reliability while reducing annotation time by 65%, though performance degrades on semantically complex or lexically diverse narratives.

Fine-tuning an LLM to write docs like it's 1995

Hacker News Top

The author fine-tuned a local LLM on a corpus of 1990s Microsoft manuals to generate documentation in that vintage style, exploring local model customization for technical writing.