Reasoning Denoiser: Denoising Reasoning Traces for Hallucination Detection in Large Reasoning Models
Summary
Introduces ReDe, a framework that denoises reasoning traces by filtering irrelevant and repetitive steps to improve hallucination detection in large reasoning models, achieving up to 87.32 AUROC on TruthfulQA.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/28/26, 10:24 AM
Paper page - Reasoning Denoiser: Denoising Reasoning Traces for Hallucination Detection in Large Reasoning Models
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2607.22098 👋 Hi Hugging Face community! We’re excited to share our new paper:
https://huggingface.co/papers/2607.22098#%F0%9F%A7%A0-reasoning-denoiser-denoising-reasoning-traces-for-hallucination-detection-in-large-reasoning-models🧠 Reasoning Denoiser: Denoising Reasoning Traces for Hallucination Detection in Large Reasoning Models
Large reasoning models generate long chains of thought, but are all reasoning steps useful for detecting hallucinations?
We find that reasoning traces frequently contain two types of noise:
🔸Irrelevant stepsthat contribute little to solving the problem 🔸Repetitive stepswhose information is already captured elsewhere
These noisy steps can obscure the signals needed to determine whether the final answer is correct.
To address this, we introduceReDe, a lightweight framework that:
✅ Uses final-answer attention as automatic supervision ✅ Learns representations that separate informative and noisy steps ✅ Filters reasoning traces without human step-level annotations ✅ Can be combined with probing-, uncertainty-, and verbalization-based detectors
📈 Across TruthfulQA, MATH, CodeElo, and MultiHopQA, ReDe consistently improves hallucination detection on Qwen3 and DeepSeek-R1 models. On TruthfulQA, it improves AUROC by up to18.69 percentage points, reaching87.32 AUROC.
Our main takeaway is simple:
For reliable reasoning models, we should not only analyze the reasoning trace—we should denoise it first.
📄 Paper:https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22098
We would love to hear the community’s thoughts:What other downstream applications could benefit from filtering noisy reasoning steps?
Similar Articles
Mitigating Factual Hallucination in Large Reasoning Models via Mixed-Mode Advantage Regularization
Introduces MARGO, a reinforcement learning framework that uses mixed-mode advantage regularization to mitigate thinking-induced hallucinations in large reasoning models by comparing thinking and non-thinking trajectories.
REIN: Bridging the Gap between Reasoning and Reliability via Reflection and Abstention Alignment
This paper introduces REIN, an alignment framework that reduces hallucination in large reasoning models by training them to explicitly reflect before answering and to abstain when knowledge is insufficient. Experiments show consistent gains in selective accuracy and hallucination reduction across benchmarks.
ReasoningLens: Hierarchical Visualization and Diagnostic Auditing for Large Reasoning Models
ReasoningLens is an open-source framework that provides hierarchical visualization and diagnostic auditing for complex reasoning chains in large reasoning models, enabling structured analysis and error detection.
ClinHallu: A Benchmark for Diagnosing Stage-Wise Hallucinations in Medical MLLM Reasoning
ClinHallu is a benchmark for diagnosing and mitigating hallucinations in medical multimodal large language models by decomposing reasoning into visual recognition, knowledge recall, and reasoning integration stages, using trace-supervised fine-tuning to reduce errors.
Reasoning Jury: Multi-Model Consensus for Evaluating Reasoning Traces
This paper introduces Reasoning Jury, a system that uses a jury of open-weight LLMs with a moderated consensus mechanism to evaluate long reasoning traces, significantly outperforming frontier models at identifying reasoning defects while costing a fraction of the price.