@KevinNaughtonJr: i can't believe software is dead it's a shame because i spent all these years getting good at solving hard problems suc…
Summary
一条带有讽刺意味的推文，感慨“软件已死”，哀叹多年积累的解决难题的技能似乎不再有用，暗指 AI 编程工具对软件开发行业的影响。
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/15/26, 10:18 PM
i can’t believe software is dead
it’s a shame because i spent all these years getting good at solving hard problems
sucks that those skills aren’t applicable to anything else
Similar Articles
@KevinNaughtonJr: every software engineer is now just a glorified agent manager
一条推文感慨如今的软件工程师都变成了「高级智能体管理员」，反映了 AI 编程助手对开发者工作方式的影响。
@KevinNaughtonJr: i left big tech before using AI to code was widely adopted processes at these companies were already slower than molass…
作者在AI编码工具大规模普及前离开了大厂，好奇这些公司如今是否已适应AI编程，或在验证变更、构建、部署和发布环节上瓶颈是否更加严重。
What I've been seeing lately (in software)
作者反思软件行业中的生成式AI浪潮，记录了坚持'手工软件'精神的小型社区与项目（如Polyphony、Evocation、slopscore），呼吁以人本主义的设计实践和组织方式抵抗AI流水线化。
Where is all the new, good software?
Nate Meyvis 探讨了为什么在 AI 编码工具盛行的当下，人们似乎没有看到更多全新且优秀的软件，并列举了九个推测性的解释，包括软件改进以不易察觉的方式发生、私有软件取代公开软件等。
@ai_super_niko: https://x.com/ai_super_niko/status/2070299861757616606
This article discusses whether computer professionals still need to learn technical skills in an era where AI can write code. The author argues that surface-level technologies like syntax and APIs are depreciating, but deeper capabilities such as algorithms, design architecture, and judgment become more important. The focus of learning should shift from beginner-level skills to the knowledge required of senior engineers.