Terminal Bench 4.0 just dropped, GLM-5.3 is at the same level as Fable 5, accounting for margin of error
Summary
Terminal Bench 4.0 has been released, comparing AI models like GLM-5.3 and Fable 5, with a focus on rapid iteration to combat benchmark saturation and raising questions about cost-effective alternatives for evaluating coding agents.
Similar Articles
@cline: GLM-5.3 (max) outperforms GPT-5.6 Sol (max) on the new Terminal-Bench 4.0. Incredible seeing open weights compete with …
GLM-5.3 (max) outperforms GPT-5.6 Sol (max) on Terminal-Bench 4.0, highlighting the competitiveness of open-weight AI models, with Cline promoted for discounted access.
@thoughtfullab: GLM 5.2 is 5x cheaper than Opus 4.8 and 11x than Fable 5, yet it tops PostTrainBench. That’s exciting because lower cos…
GLM 5.2 tops PostTrainBench while being 5x cheaper than Opus 4.8 and 11x cheaper than Fable 5, making personalized AI economically viable for companies and countries.
GLM5.3 Artificial Analysis Benchmarks
This article presents a detailed benchmark analysis of the GLM-5.3 AI model, evaluating its intelligence and performance across multiple tests by Artificial Analysis.
Fable 5 below even Gemini 3.1 on Livebench
A discussion on LiveBench results showing Fable 5 performing below Gemini 3.1, questioning whether the benchmark is flawed or Anthropic is optimizing for benchmarks.
@TheAhmadOsman: GLM 5.2 numbers make me believe I was too conservative in my own prediction 2 months tops and we'll have Fable 5 at home
A prediction that open-source AI models will achieve parity with a hypothetical Fable 5 within two months, based on GLM 5.2 benchmark numbers.