@tom_doerr: Generates PhD proposals, writes literature reviews, and creates fidelity-first academic slides with vector equations an…

X AI KOLs Timeline Tools

Summary

A collection of Claude Code skills for academic research workflows, including literature reviews, PhD proposals, and fidelity-first academic slides with vector equations and citations.

Generates PhD proposals, writes literature reviews, and creates fidelity-first academic slides with vector equations and grounded citations. https://t.co/FDlGt6m28r https://t.co/iwF1NXp8Lr
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/30/26, 11:52 AM

Generates PhD proposals, writes literature reviews, and creates fidelity-first academic slides with vector equations and grounded citations.

https://t.co/FDlGt6m28r https://t.co/iwF1NXp8Lr


luwill/research-skills

Source: https://github.com/luwill/research-skills

Research Skills

A collection of Claude Code skills for academic research workflows.

Skills

SkillDescriptionTrigger
medical-imaging-reviewWrite comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI/medical-imaging-review, “review paper”, “survey”, “综述”
paper-slide-deckStylized slide images (17 T2I aesthetic styles) for reading & sharing — any content/paper-slide-deck content.md --style watercolor
research-proposalGenerate PhD research proposals with Nature Reviews-style academic writing/research-proposal, “research proposal”, “PhD proposal”, “研究计划”
scholar-slidesFidelity-first academic decks for a live talk — vector equations, extracted figures, grounded citations, editable PPTX“make slides”, “组会 PPT”, “答辩幻灯片”, a paper PDF / arXiv / DOI

Slides from a paper? Two different tools, on purpose. Use scholar-slides for a faithful, editable live talk — equations, numbers, tables, and citations stay exact and projector-ready. Use paper-slide-deck for stylized visual images to read or share, where look-and-feel matters more than editable precision (its slides are AI-generated images, so math and data are not editable and can be garbled — don’t use it for a defense or a results-heavy talk).

Installation

Copy the desired skill folder into your Claude Code skills directory:

cp -r medical-imaging-review ~/.claude/skills/
cp -r paper-slide-deck       ~/.claude/skills/
cp -r research-proposal      ~/.claude/skills/
cp -r scholar-slides         ~/.claude/skills/

scholar-slides carries Python + Node toolchains; after copying, provision them once:

cd ~/.claude/skills/scholar-slides && ./install.sh

Medical Imaging Review Skill

A systematic workflow for writing survey papers, systematic reviews, and literature analyses on medical imaging AI topics.

Features

  • Structured 8-phase write-with-verify workflow (review-type routing → paradigm capture → init → collect-and-verify → outline/taxonomy → per-claim-verified writing → peer review → submission prep)
  • Review-type routing — narrative / method survey / scoping / systematic, with matching reporting standards (PRISMA 2020, QUADAS-3, CLAIM 2024, TRIPOD+AI)
  • Citation integrity as a hard gate — every [N] verified for existence, author, number, and direction before commit; an executable audit script (scripts/audit_manuscript.py) locked by a fixture test suite
  • Evidence-calibrated writing voice — match claim strength to evidence; the default-hedging register is explicitly removed as an AI tell
  • Domain-specific 3-axis method taxonomy across multiple medical imaging domains
  • Quality checklists and Zotero-first literature collection with tool-portable fallbacks

Supported Domains

  • Coronary Artery Analysis (CCTA)
  • Lung Imaging (CT/X-ray)
  • Brain Imaging (MRI/CT)
  • Cardiac Imaging (MRI/CT/Echo)
  • Pathology (Whole Slide Images)
  • Retinal Imaging (Fundus/OCT)

Files

PathDescription
SKILL.mdMain skill definition and quick reference
references/REVIEW_TYPES.mdReview-type routing (narrative / scoping / systematic / meta-analysis)
references/REPORTING_STANDARDS.mdPRISMA / QUADAS-3 / CLAIM / TRIPOD+AI standards fit
references/WORKFLOW.mdDetailed 8-phase workflow guide
references/PARADIGM.mdPhase 0 exemplar-review style capture
references/CITATION_INTEGRITY.mdThe citation verification protocol (5 rules)
references/HALLUCINATION_PATTERNS.md10 LLM hallucination indicators to self-check
references/TEMPLATES.mdProject file templates
references/DOMAINS.mdDomain-specific method categories and datasets
references/MCP_SETUP.mdArXiv, PubMed, Zotero MCP configuration and fallbacks
references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.mdPre-submission quality checklist
scripts/audit_manuscript.pyExecutable manuscript audit (with scripts/tests/ fixtures)

Paper Slide Deck Skill

Transform any content into stylized, shareable slide images (AI-generated), with figure detection and high-resolution page rendering from PDFs.

Text, math, and data are baked into each image and not editable — for a faithful, editable academic talk (组会/答辩/results-heavy) use scholar-slides instead.

Features

  • Caption-based figure detection from PDF papers (locates the page; human confirmation recommended for dense two-column layouts)
  • Figure-to-slide mapping with full-page high-res render + template container (not per-figure bbox cropping)
  • 17 visual styles (academic-paper, sketch-notes, minimal, etc.)
  • Gemini API integration (gemini-3-pro-image) for AI slide generation, with a post-generation garbled-text proofread pass
  • PPTX/PDF export with merge scripts

Workflow

  1. Analyze paper and detect figures/tables
  2. Generate outline with auto IMAGE_SOURCE mapping
  3. Extract figures from PDF (or AI-generate)
  4. Apply academic templates
  5. Merge to PPTX/PDF

Files

PathDescription
SKILL.mdMain skill definition and workflow
references/Analysis framework, templates, style definitions
scripts/Python/TypeScript automation scripts

Scripts

ScriptPurpose
generate-slides.pyGemini API image generation
detect-figures.tsPDF figure/table detection
extract-figure.tsPDF page extraction
apply-template.tsAcademic figure container template
merge-to-pptx.tsPPTX generation
merge-to-pdf.tsPDF generation

Research Proposal Skill

Generate high-quality academic research proposals — PhD applications, research plans, 研究计划书 / 开题报告 — following Nature Reviews-style academic writing conventions.

Features

  • Structured 5-phase workflow with a write-with-verify content stage: Requirements → Literature (+verification gate) → Outline (approval red line) → Content (section-by-section) → Output
  • Citation-integrity guardrails: every reference verified to exist (DOI/PMID/arXiv or Zotero) with author and year matching the source — unverifiable entries are flagged, never fabricated
  • Multi-source literature integration: WebSearch, Zotero MCP, arXiv, PubMed (with tool-portable fallbacks)
  • Bilingual support: English and Chinese (中文)
  • Domain adaptation: STEM (incl. computational / ML / AI-for-Science), Humanities, Social Sciences
  • Academic writing style: prose-based, evidence-calibrated language; reference count follows the argument (no padding quota)

Workflow

  1. Gather requirements (topic, domain, language, word count)
  2. Collect literature from multiple sources
  3. Generate outline for user approval
  4. Write full proposal based on approved outline
  5. Output Markdown with quality checklist

Files

PathDescription
SKILL.mdMain skill definition and 5-phase workflow
references/STRUCTURE_GUIDE.mdSection-by-section writing guide
references/DOMAIN_TEMPLATES.mdSTEM vs Humanities differences
references/WRITING_STYLE_GUIDE.mdNature Reviews academic writing style
references/CITATION_INTEGRITY.mdReference verification protocol (5 rules, author-year style)
references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.mdQuality verification checklist
references/LITERATURE_WORKFLOW.mdLiterature collection workflow
assets/proposal_scaffold_en.mdEnglish template scaffold
assets/proposal_scaffold_zh.mdChinese template scaffold

Output

  • Target: 2,000-4,000 words (default ~3,000)
  • References: count follows the argument (typically 25–50; no minimum, no padding), each verified
  • 3-5 figure suggestions
  • Markdown format (convertible to DOCX/PDF via pandoc)

Scholar Slides Skill

Turn a research paper (or arXiv/DOI link, or a topic) into a fidelity-first slide deck — one where every equation, table, number, figure, and citation stays true vector/text and traceable to the source, never rasterized by an image model and never fabricated. Where paper-slide-deck optimizes visual style via text-to-image, scholar-slides inverts the priority for scholarly work: source fidelity > polish, behind an executable integrity gate.

Features

  • Fidelity-first rendering — KaTeX vector equations, real <table>/OOXML tables, cited figure crops; numbers grounded against the source, no fabrication
  • Integrity QA gate — number grounding, [MISSING]/[UNVERIFIED] flags instead of silent fills, PPTX-parity regression, a scoreable aesthetics rubric
  • Two registers — journal-club (组会, reading-first) and conference (big-room), via a token-based theme system
  • Bilingual — English default, full 中文 / CJK support
  • Zotero-first citations with Crossref / arXiv / DOI fallback

Outputs

  • Interactive reveal.js deck (with browser speaker view)
  • One-page-per-slide vector PDF
  • Editable PPTX (native text, bullets, tables, speaker notes; equations/figures as flagged images)
  • Speaker notes with a bilingual talk-time estimate

Install & run

cd ~/.claude/skills/scholar-slides && ./install.sh   # .venv + npm + Chromium, then self-checks

Prereqs: Python 3.11+, Node 18+. For Chinese decks on Linux: sudo apt-get install fonts-noto-cjk (macOS/Windows already have CJK fonts).

Known limitation

Figure localization is layout-dependent — ~95–100% on single-column / arXiv / Nature-style papers, ~75% on dense IEEE/TPAMI two-column pages. Low-confidence crops are flagged for you to confirm, never silently wrong. Stress-tested over 9 cross-layout papers: 0 crashes, 98% of figures localized. See scholar-slides/README.md for the full story.


License

MIT License

Similar Articles

Academic Research Skills for Claude Code

Hacker News Top

A plugin suite for Claude Code that assists academic researchers with the full pipeline from research to publication, emphasizing human-in-the-loop integrity checks and style calibration.