Paper Agents, Paper Gains: An Empirical Analysis of DeFi Investment Agents

# Paper Agents, Paper Gains: An Empirical Analysis of DeFi Investment Agents
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29174](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29174)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.29174)

> Abstract:DeFi investment agents, systems that use AI for autonomous on\-chain trading, have attained over USD 3 billion in combined token valuations since late 2024\. We survey over 1,900 AI\-tagged crypto projects, filter to investment\-focused agents, and curate 10 representative projects spanning strategy and observability dimensions\. We then conduct a deep\-dive architectural analysis of two prominent agent frameworks, ElizaOS and Virtuals Protocol, and a quantitative on\-chain performance analysis of 11 Solana\-based agent treasuries with publicly attributable trading activity, covering 925,323 token holders\. We find that current deployments remain early and heterogeneous: \(1\) in our sample, many projects do not yet provide clear evidence of autonomous trade execution, and developer interviews suggest that many visible deployments remain basic API integrations; \(2\) agent treasuries retain over USD 30M in paper gains while token holders collectively lost USD 191\.7M, with the top 1% of wallets capturing 81\.4% of all gains \(USD 1\.81B\); \(3\) token valuations are weakly connected to treasury fundamentals, with market\-cap\-to\-AUM ratios exceeding 10,000x versus below 1x for established DeFi protocols; and \(4\) aggregate user gains peaked at USD 2\.4B before declining to net losses, with median returns negative on every platform and tokens declining 93% on average from all\-time highs\. We interpret these outcomes as characteristic of a permissionless, first\-generation market in which open infrastructure enables rapid experimentation but also allows naive or speculative agents to launch before robust standards for autonomy, performance, and stakeholder alignment emerge\. We therefore propose a maturity framework along three dimensions: autonomous execution, risk\-adjusted profitability, and stakeholder alignment, to characterize the gap between current deployments and future investment\-grade agent systems\.

## Submission history

From: Danning Sui \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/22afe0c0/2605.29174)\] **\[v1\]**Wed, 27 May 2026 23:21:42 UTC \(1,489 KB\)