@rohanpaul_ai: New Princeton Univ + Google paper finds that the decision model most accurate on isolated questions solved only 69.5% o…

X AI KOLs Following Papers

Summary

普林斯顿大学与Google的联合论文提出JevAgentHarness,将智能体工作流中的常规决策(如工具选择)交给经智能体实际状态训练的小型决策模型(如AgentDecision-4B),在保持成功率的同时使成本降低81%–89%、速度提升最高2.5倍。

New Princeton Univ + Google paper finds that the decision model most accurate on isolated questions solved only 69.5% of agent tasks, while a 4B model trained on agent states solved 91.5%. Agent harnesses call a big LLM at every step, which makes long tasks slow and costly. Yet most of those calls just pick from a list, like which tool to use next. Their harness asks a fast decision model each multiple-choice question and uses its answer only above a confidence threshold fitted on the agent's own runs. They also trained AgentDecision-4B on states the agent actually reaches, including after its own mistakes. On tasks like their training data, 4B models trained this way made agents 81.1% to 89.0% cheaper and up to 2.5x faster. Success stayed within 3 points, while handing over every tool choice with no threshold lowered success by 19.0 points. To hand routine agent choices to a small model, train it and set its confidence threshold on your agent's own runs. – arxiv. org/abs/2610.21412 Title: "JevAgentHarness: Benchmarking, Deploying and Training Decision Models That Share Control with LLMs"
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/19/26, 01:19 PM

New Princeton Univ + Google paper finds that the decision model most accurate on isolated questions solved only 69.5% of agent tasks, while a 4B model trained on agent states solved 91.5%.

Agent harnesses call a big LLM at every step, which makes long tasks slow and costly. Yet most of those calls just pick from a list, like which tool to use next.

Their harness asks a fast decision model each multiple-choice question and uses its answer only above a confidence threshold fitted on the agent’s own runs. They also trained AgentDecision-4B on states the agent actually reaches, including after its own mistakes.

On tasks like their training data, 4B models trained this way made agents 81.1% to 89.0% cheaper and up to 2.5x faster. Success stayed within 3 points, while handing over every tool choice with no threshold lowered success by 19.0 points.

To hand routine agent choices to a small model, train it and set its confidence threshold on your agent’s own runs.

– arxiv. org/abs/2610.21412

Title: “JevAgentHarness: Benchmarking, Deploying and Training Decision Models That Share Control with LLMs”

Similar Articles

New paper from Stanford, Together AI, UIUC, and Meta introduces Hybrid Reasoning Agents. These AI models think mostly in a hidden internal way (faster and cheaper), and only use normal text when they need tools or give the final answer.

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

Stanford、Together AI、UIUC 与 Meta 联合提出 Hybrid Reasoning Agents,让模型主要通过隐藏的内部推理进行思考(更快、更省),仅在调用工具或给出最终答案时使用显式文本,在数学、科学、医疗等测试上提升约 10%,同时 token 减半、速度翻倍且成本更低。