AI Companies Are Lying To Us

Reddit r/singularity News

Summary

OpenAI leaders Sam Altman and Greg Brockman publicly reject cash UBI, proposing instead company-issued compute credits as the path to "universal high income," while acknowledging that true mastery of AI agents will still create trillionaires.

[https://youtu.be/NCKQL0op30E?si=rwhvH0IKULxa83Kc](https://youtu.be/NCKQL0op30E?si=rwhvH0IKULxa83Kc) “People who really know how to use these agents will become trillionaires” Why does it require expertise to use AGI/ASI? Isnt the point of AGI/ASI that all of these things are done for you? How are trillionaires going to exist with UBI? Sounds like they dont intend to tax revenue on AGI/ASI produced profits. “People with access to compute will achieve the American Dream” Sam explains that if compute is made accessible to everyone that it could lead to the most extreme version of the American Dream. Sounds like these con men want to replace UBI with compute points. They will take a cut on every dollar of “UBI”. No free money from taxing AI companies… just free compute points. What exactly can be built with minimal compute? A movie ? A book? An AI social media influencer? If so im sure millions of AI made movies will be made a year. Good luck making money inside an extremely saturated market. They are seriously so dumb and don’t know how business works. Even if I had enough compute to produce the structure of a new drug I would still need millions in funding to get the drug made. How am i supposed to compete against billion dollar companies like Pfizer? Lastly, their nonprofit (essentially a UBI fund) is only 30% of OpenAI equity. These chuds have ZERO interest in creating Universal High Income. If they did they would urge congress to tax all AI companies profits once AGI l/ASI is produced. Instead they peddle lies that free compute access will make you rich. Good luck competing with billion dollar corporations who also have access to the same systems and actually have the capital to invest on ideas (like a newly developed drug) generated by the AGI/ASI. Dario is the only AI CEO i have heard say that AI companies should be taxed although he didnt say exactly what percent. It should be damn near all the profit. Leave them just enough to keep the ASI powered on and innovating. Many people argue if you tax billionaires or millionaires into oblivion that there will be no incentive to become an entrepreneur. That idea is destroyed by having ASI and AGI be the sole driver of the business. CEOs like Elon Musk will have nowhere to hide. No reason to justify their massive wealth as they are not needed whatsoever in an ASI/AGI run company.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 04/23/26, 06:44 AM

TL;DR: Sam Altman and Greg Brockman insist that super-intelligence will unlock “universal high income,” but their own words reveal a compute-for-everything scheme that replaces cash UBI with company-issued “points,” leaves trillionaires intact, and taxes nothing—an end-run around public AI dividends. ## The 90-Minute “Palace Intrigue” in One Room OpenAI’s last two remaining co-founders, Sam Altman (CEO) and Greg Brockman (President), sat down together for the first time on a single podcast—*Core Memory* with Ashlee Vance and Kylie Robinson—to mark the lab’s tenth birthday. The conversation quickly pivoted from nostalgia to the future they are still pitching: artificial general intelligence (AGI) followed quickly by artificial super-intelligence (ASI) that “adapts to humans” and floods the planet with cheap cognition. ## “People Who Really Know How to Use These Agents Will Become Trillionaires” Altman repeated a line he has tested in several recent talks: mastery of AI agents, not mere access, will be the new source of extreme wealth. When pressed on why super-intelligence still demands human “expertise,” he answered that the gap between “can do anything” and “knows what to ask for” will remain wide, creating a new class of trillion-dollar operators. ## Universal High Income, Not UBI—and Definitely Not a Tax The pair explicitly rejected permanent cash transfers funded by AI profits. Instead, Altman sketched a future where OpenAI (and presumably its peers) issues “compute credits” redeemable for tokens, cycles, or inference time. - “If compute is made accessible to everyone that could lead to the most extreme version of the American Dream,” Altman said. - Brockman added that their capped-profit vehicle has already earmarked “roughly 30 % of OpenAI equity” for a nonprofit fund whose charter is still being written. No mention of congressional tax legislation appears anywhere in the 90-minute interview. ## Compute Points as Currency: What You Can (and Can’t) Build Altman rattled off low-capital creative goods—movies, books, AI influencers—as examples of what a teenager could conjure with a modest stipend of GPU hours. The hosts asked how an individual would finance FDA trials for a newly designed drug. Brockman conceded that “dry-lab” discovery is only step one; wet labs, Phase III trials, and manufacturing still require “millions in funding,” leaving billion-dollar incumbents like Pfizer with their moats intact. ## Regulatory Capture and the Safety Narrative Both executives argued that iterative deployment—shipping ever-larger models and watching them break—*is* their safety strategy. Brockman said early internal fights were not over whether to be safe, but over “how to talk about safety without it becoming a power move.” The result: OpenAI now lobbies for light-touch, pre-deployment testing frameworks rather than revenue-linked liability or compute taxes. ## The Thirty-Percent Fig-Leaf OpenAI’s original 2015 nonprofit owns a minority share of the for-profit holding company. Altman reiterated that the board can “pull the plug” if humanity-level risk appears, but dodged questions about dividend flow, share-class voting power, or what happens once the capped-profit investor return hurdle ($100 × initial stake) is met. Critics note that 30 % is a ceiling, not a floor, and can be diluted in future funding rounds. ## “Extreme American Dream” or Compute Feudalism? Vance summarized the model: “So the state doesn’t tax the AI winners; the winners hand out tokens and keep the cash.” Altman laughed, calling it “the most inclusive form of abundance ever,” then pivoted to anecdotal stories of users who already use ChatGPT to force insurers to approve MRIs. No data on average user earnings or the distribution of compute vouchers was offered. ## What’s Next: GPT-5, Agents, and Robotics - GPT-5 will be “materially better” but not yet ASI, Brockman said. - A swarm of agent prototypes is running internally; external alpha “later this year.” - Robotics partnerships (Figure, 1X) will feed physical-world data back into the model loop, accelerating the path to “fully general” systems. ## Source [AI Companies Are Lying To Us – Gullible_Pen1074](https://youtu.be/NCKQL0op30E)

Similar Articles

Big Tech Is Raising Billions To Stop UBI

Reddit r/singularity

A new organization called RAISE US, backed by major tech companies including Amazon, Microsoft, and OpenAI Foundation, has launched with over $500 million in funding to advocate against universal basic income in response to AI disruptions.

Who will buy your services if you fire us all?

Hacker News Top

The article critiques the narrative of tech executives like Sam Altman and Elon Musk about AI leading to shorter workweeks and UBI, arguing that automation destroys the customer base needed for AI services, and draws historical parallels to indentured labor and the creation of the working consumer.

AI's Affordability Crisis

Hacker News Top

The article analyzes the unsustainable economics of AI platforms, revealing massive subsidies where companies like OpenAI and Anthropic lose billions by charging far below cost, leading to an affordability crisis.