AI Agent builders: how do you actually keep track what competitors are shipping, and figure out what product features to build next in crowded verticals like healthcare, finance, legal, etc?
Summary
The article questions AI agent builders on methods for tracking competitor features, deciding product roadmaps, and understanding buyer preferences in competitive verticals.
Similar Articles
AI Agent Builders: How do you actually decide what product feature to build next for your AI agent?
The article discusses the challenges AI agent builders face in deciding which product features to build next, highlighting the manual and frustrating aspects of this process.
Any AI Agent builders building in the legal, healthcare, marketing and/or finance verticals?
If you're building an AI agent for legal, healthcare, marketing, or finance, I'm curious to hear: What is your company name and what does your agent do? Roughly how many customers you've got What use case(s) in your vertical you specialise in. I'm interested to check out your websites as well.
How do you keep your AI agent’s stack up to date as better models/tools come out?
The author discusses the challenge of keeping AI agent stacks current with evolving models and tools, and seeks insights from production teams on benchmarking and update practices.
Customer discovery insights from talking to operators about agent products - looking for builder perspective
Insights from customer discovery interviews with operators about AI agent products, seeking perspectives from builders.
AI agents are about to become software buyers. Is anyone else thinking about this?
This article discusses the emerging trend of AI agents acting as software buyers, highlighting the lack of standardized protocols for agent-friendly product evaluation, pricing discovery, and autonomous checkout. It proposes three existing solutions—llms.txt, MCP servers, and agent checkout protocols—and questions whether companies are prepared for non-human traffic.