Reviewed 250+ real AI implementations, a few things surprised me...
Summary
The author shares insights from reviewing 250+ real-world AI implementations, highlighting that Engineering and Finance are leading adoption while most outcomes focus on speed rather than cost reduction or revenue growth.
Similar Articles
Has AI adoption at work matched the hype?
A discussion on the state of AI adoption in companies, questioning whether off-the-shelf tools or custom solutions are more successful.
Understanding the AI economy (7 minute read)
Google launches ATLAS, a large-scale study analyzing 15 million AI interactions to understand how people use AI at work and in daily life, revealing broad but shallow adoption and collaborative use over automation.
The AI productivity numbers don't match what I actually see on my team
The author, running a small dev team, shares mixed real-world results from using AI coding tools: they speed up boilerplate and onboarding, but produce confident wrong answers on complex problems and increase code review workload, yielding modest net gains far below the often-cited 10x improvement.
The deployment funnel nobody talks about: 60% evaluate, 20% pilot, 5% ship. MIT tracked 300 real AI implementations against profit metrics.
MIT researchers tracked 300 real AI implementations and found that only 5% of evaluations lead to full production deployment, with 95% of AI investment not producing measurable outcomes. Successful deployments focused on bounded tasks with defined success metrics.
The state of AI in 2026: On the road to ROI
An article exploring the anticipated developments in AI by 2026, with an emphasis on realizing return on investment.