@oegerikus: Security is an economic decision. For a fixed cost, within @XBOW, which model has the best odds of crafting an exploit?…
Summary
A comparison of AI models (GPT-5.5, Mythos, Opus 4.6) for their effectiveness in crafting exploits within the XBOW framework, suggesting that security is an economic decision with fixed costs.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/13/26, 06:25 PM
Security is an economic decision.
For a fixed cost, within @XBOW, which model has the best odds of crafting an exploit?
GPT-5.5 > Mythos > Opus 4.6 on real OSS web vulns.
Curves below. https://t.co/4u3aPxFR2q
Similar Articles
More evidence of Mythos's strength in Cybersecurity/Hacking - compared to 5.5, it got 18/41 n-day exploits, vs 1/41. Open Source/Weights models get nothing
Mythos demonstrates strong performance in cybersecurity hacking, achieving 18 out of 41 n-day exploits compared to 1 for version 5.5, while open-source models get none.
@logangraham: A lot of people have been wondering about Mythos, Glasswing, and the vulns we / our partners are fixing. Today, I’m exc…
Anthropic's Claude Mythos Preview model has been evaluated by XBOW and UK AISI, showing unprecedented autonomous cybersecurity capabilities, including solving end-to-end cyber ranges and finding thousands of vulnerabilities. The announcement emphasizes the need to prepare for rapidly advancing AI capabilities in cybersecurity.
Anthropic study shows AI can build working exploits from security patches in hours, not weeks
Anthropic's study demonstrates that large language models can rapidly generate working exploits from security patches, reducing the time from weeks to hours, raising concerns about AI-driven vulnerability exploitation.
Cybersecurity Looks Like Proof of Work Now
The UK's AI Safety Institute's evaluation of Claude Mythos shows that AI-driven security vulnerability detection creates a new economic model where cybersecurity becomes a token-spending competition, incentivizing continuous investment in security reviews and making open-source libraries more valuable as shared security infrastructure.
Measuring LLMs' impact on N-day exploits (18 minute read)
This article from Anthropic evaluates how large language models like Claude Mythos Preview can accelerate the development of exploits for N-day vulnerabilities. Across tests on Firefox and Windows kernel patches, the model autonomously built working exploit chains, highlighting increased risks in the patch gap.