i get to know people are burning 100 million claude tokens for just a few dollars so i did research, and find out this
Summary
Research reveals a market where cheap Claude API access is achieved via stolen identities, deepfaked KYC, and smaller models masquerading as Claude, with all data being logged permanently—posing significant security and privacy risks.
Similar Articles
@adxtyahq: Chinese students are buying GPT-5.4/5.5 and Claude API access from Xianyu/Taobao proxy sellers for almost 96-97% cheape…
Chinese students are buying heavily discounted GPT-5.4/5.5 and Claude API access from proxy sellers on Xianyu/Taobao, enabling them to burn 100M+ tokens daily for about $1 and engage in extensive vibecoding.
@_avichawla: A smarter Claude model burns more tokens, not fewer! And it's not a minor 3-5% difference. But 54% higher token usage. …
The article analyzes why smarter AI agents like Claude consume more tokens when interacting with human-centric backends like Supabase due to inefficient context discovery. It introduces InsForge, an open-source backend tool designed for agents that provides structured context to significantly reduce token usage and manual interventions.
Claude Mythos AI unauthorised access claim probed by Anthropic
Anthropic is investigating claims that unauthorized users accessed its restricted Claude Mythos cybersecurity model via a third-party vendor, raising concerns about securing frontier AI systems.
Mystery company accidentally blew $500 million on Claude AI in a single month — failed to put usage limit on licenses for employees
A mysterious company accidentally spent $500 million in one month on Claude AI due to failing to set usage limits, highlighting growing concerns about AI spending returns.
@cyrilXBT: ANDREJ KARPATHY SPENT 4 MINUTES IN AN INTERVIEW AND ACCIDENTALLY EXPOSED HOW ALMOST NOBODY IS ACTUALLY USING CLAUDE. No…
Andrej Karpathy highlighted that most developers misuse Claude by not configuring it properly; a developer created 21 configuration rules that boosted Claude Code's accuracy from 65% to 94%, garnering 82,000 GitHub stars.