Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B Q4 running 60tk/s on 4070Ti.
Summary
A user reports achieving 60 tokens per second with the Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B MOE model on an NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti, demonstrating efficient local inference optimization.
Similar Articles
Ornith-397B running at Q4 on a single RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96GB - 2,354 tok/s prefill, ~20–24 tok/s decode
Krasis, a MoE-focused runtime, enables running the 397B-parameter Ornith model on a single RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96GB GPU with ~20-24 tok/s decode by dynamically managing expert residency in VRAM.
@ItsmeAjayKV: Quick update: I tried Ornith-1.0-35B-Q5_K_M on my 3090, and i have mixed feelings. The good: it's really fast. I measur…
User tests Ornith-1.0-35B on an RTX 3090, finding fast inference speeds (1560 tok/s prompt, 78 tok/s generation) but consistently worse coding performance on Three.js tasks compared to Qwen 3.6, even after multiple attempts.
@sudoingX: i was running Ornith new 35b moe on llama.cpp with a Q4 quant, 4 bit, small, fast. it hit ~78 tok/s. then i swapped eng…
A 35B MoE agentic coding model called Ornith runs near lossless at FP8 on a single DGX Spark, achieving 3M token context and ~36 tok/s, with speculative decoding expected to boost speed further.
4090 + 5060 Ti + 64GB RAM: 206 t/s on a 35B-A3B, and a 122B at 37 t/s
A user shares benchmark results for running large language models (Qwen 27B-122B) on a dual-GPU setup with RTX 4090 and RTX 5060 Ti, achieving high token generation speeds (e.g., 206 t/s on 35B-A3B, 37-41 t/s on 122B). The post includes setup details and a link to a GitHub repo with scripts and raw data.
Local benchmarks with a RTX 3090 - Qwen3.6 27b vs Ornith
User runs local benchmarks comparing Qwen3.6 27b, Gemma4 26B, and Ornith1.0 35B on an RTX 3090 using inspect-ai. Results show Qwen leading in knowledge and coding, while Ornith is competitive in grounding and recall.