@FinanceYF5: Samuel Ting's Four Methodologies 1/ A conference that talked from start to finish about how AI accelerates scientific research, the ninety-year-old Samuel Ting connected from the other end of the screen. What he talked about was not AI, but how a person decides to redo something that everyone thinks has already been done.
Summary
Samuel Ting shared his four methodologies at the conference on AI accelerating scientific research, emphasizing redoing what everyone thinks has already been done.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/09/26, 03:17 AM
Ding Zhaozhong’s Four Methodologies
1/ A conference entirely about how AI accelerates scientific research — and ninety-year-old Ding Zhaozhong joins in from the other side of the screen.
What he talks about is not AI, but how a person decides to redo something that everyone believes has already been completed. https://t.co/bSVKtHnTa5
2/ His criteria for choosing a topic are simple: not “has anyone done this before,” but “if this conclusion turns out to be wrong, what would it shake?”
What he picks are precisely results that the world’s top experts have worked on for years — and that have been independently reproduced.
3/ The second point is even more demanding: you must use an independent method.
Redoing it with the same technique only reproduces the same systematic error.
4/ Third, you must accept the cost in advance.
To run an experiment that others believed already had an answer, he left the United States. To run an experiment that two major laboratories both rejected, he found his own way.
5/ Fourth, the timeline is set by the question, not by patience.
Measuring the size of the electron took eight months. AMS took more than a decade.
The bigger the question, the longer the time.
6/ Sitting in the audience and listening, the most direct feeling was this: in an era where everyone is chasing “faster,” there is still someone seriously discussing “how to confirm that something is true.”
7/ What do you think is most lacking in scientific research today — speed, or this willingness to redo “answers that already exist”?
That’s all.
If you enjoy this topic:
- Follow me (@FinanceYF5)
- Like + repost the first post below
a16z on why open-weight models matter: cost and control.
“The world can’t be controlled by proprietary APIs alone.”
“Closed-source models are too expensive, and I want to control the infrastructure and the model myself — whether it’s adding guardrails or scaling it up.”
For a business like voice agents, you must ensure the model responds on time — only a model you control yourself can do that, rather than tying critical infrastructure to proprietary APIs that could go down at any moment.
Similar Articles
@MinLiBuilds: I wish I had read such an excellent article during my undergraduate and graduate studies; my career would have turned out completely differently. This is her research methodology, very smart and solid, with compounding returns. Translation: vivek @itsreallyvivek how to be good at r…
A methodology article on how to excel at AI research, emphasizing problem selection, literature reading, writing notes, and other skills, suitable for researchers.
@FinanceYF5: 1/ AI can do most of the things you plan to do—so what's left for you? An a16z investor gave me an answer that made me think for a long time. It's not 'find a job that AI can't do,' it's another older question
An a16z investor offers an ancient and thought-provoking answer to the question of AI replacing most jobs, sparking a discussion on personal core value.
@runes_leo: At Sequoia Ascent on 4/30, Karpathy compressed this year’s most valuable explanation of AI into three core arguments. You’ll see AI differently after reading this. 1. AI Isn’t Just “Faster,” It’s a New Paradigm For the past two years, the narrative has been that AI speeds things up. Karpathy says this is a misunderstanding...
This article summarizes Karpathy’s core points at the Sequoia Ascent conference, highlighting that AI is a paradigm shift restructuring workflows rather than merely an acceleration tool. It introduces the concept of a "jagged edge" for model capabilities based on verifiability and economic viability, and predicts that future software will evolve into an agent-native architecture where LLMs serve as the logic layer and traditional code functions as sensors and actuators.
@FinanceYF5: How to Use AI Without Letting Your Intelligence Gradually Decline? Miles Cranmer prepared a 55-minute talk for MPhil students: "How to Avoid AI Brain Rot" — covering how to avoid skill atrophy from over-reliance on AI in work and study, and how to stand out as...
Miles Cranmer prepared a 55-minute talk for MPhil students titled "How to Avoid AI Brain Rot," discussing how to prevent skill atrophy from over-reliance on AI in work and study, and how to remain competitive amid an increasingly narrow distribution of abilities.
@sleepy0x13: I increasingly feel that many people's imagination around AI has been boxed in by their past decade-plus of work experience. Today I came across an article by Felix Rieseberg, engineering lead at Claude, titled "How to be more ambitious," about how to use AI with greater ambition…
A blogger shares and comments on "How to be more ambitious" by Felix Rieseberg, engineering lead at Claude, exploring how to break free from the constraints of existing work experience and use AI to redefine problems rather than merely accelerate old workflows.