Land cover and flood type govern the detection limits of satellite-based flood mapping across diverse global flood events
Summary
A study evaluating the Prithvi-EO-2.0 foundation model for satellite-based flood mapping across 19 diverse global flood events, finding that detection accuracy is jointly governed by land cover and flood type.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/09/26, 08:52 AM
# Land cover and flood type govern the detection limits of satellite-based flood mapping across diverse global flood events Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07780](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07780) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.07780) > Abstract:Floods are among the most destructive natural hazards, and their increasing frequency under climate change makes satellite\-based inundation mapping essential for disaster response\. Geospatial foundation models pretrained on satellite archives offer geographic transferability, but their operational reliability across diverse, unseen events remains uncharacterized\. Here we deploy Prithvi\-EO\-2\.0 across 19 out\-of\-distribution flood events \(2017\-2025\) spanning six continents, eight climate zones, and six flood mechanisms, validating against two independent reference products\. Detection accuracy depended jointly on land cover and flood type, with cropland yielding the highest agreement \(IoU=52%\) and riverine events the strongest detection \(F1=0\.69\), while tree cover and built\-up areas showed near\-zero detection \(IoU=4%\) regardless of flood mechanism\. Dual\-reference validation revealed that apparent model error partly reflects definitional inconsistency between reference products rather than detection failure\. Iterative pipeline testing identified 23 failure modes, with pipeline engineering dominating initial error over model capacity\. These findings establish environment\-dependent detection boundaries for operational satellite flood mapping\. ## Submission history From: Venkatesh Kolluru Dr \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/63fe4c07/2606.07780)\] **\[v1\]**Fri, 5 Jun 2026 18:46:03 UTC \(7,964 KB\)
Similar Articles
GEOID-Flood: A Large-Scale Multi-Modal Benchmark Dataset for Flood Segmentation
Introduces GEOID-Flood, a large-scale multi-modal benchmark dataset for flood segmentation with over 14,000 tiles from 219 events across 65 countries, evaluating foundation models against conventional encoders across single-image, multi-temporal, and multi-modal protocols.
Which Site, and When: A Free-Satellite-Data Test of Himalayan Glacial Lake Bursts, Landslides, and Ice Floods
This paper evaluates machine learning models using free satellite data (radar interferometry and weather) to predict which Himalayan glacial lakes are at risk of outburst floods and when triggers occur, achieving ROC scores up to 0.89 in Nepal and providing a ranked watchlist.
Scalable and Trustworthy Earth Observation Foundation Models
This chapter reviews design principles and current landscape of foundation models for Earth observation, highlighting the need for domain-specific adaptation, physically plausible representations, and consistent evaluation benchmarks. It includes case studies on harmful algal bloom prediction and adaptive monitoring station selection.
Topology-Informed Neural Networks for Flood Detection in Optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery
This paper applies topological data analysis to flood detection by extracting topological features from satellite imagery and incorporating them into neural networks, demonstrating improved robustness and interpretability over conventional methods.
Overcoming "Physics Shock" in Earth Observation A Heteroscedastic Uncertainty Framework for PINN-based Flood Inference
This paper introduces a novel uncertainty-aware PINN framework for flood inference from SAR data, addressing 'physics shock' by dynamically relaxing physical constraints in noisy regions. Evaluated on Sen1Floods11, the method achieves a 25% improvement in IoU and provides calibrated uncertainty bounds for operational disaster response.