built another AI agent runtime. What would you do with it?
Summary
The author introduces Contenox, a personal AI agent runtime built to streamline LLM workflows, and asks the community for advice on how to monetize or share it.
Similar Articles
We open-sourced an agent runtime built for the part everyone skips: running agents on real hardware, offline
An open-source agent runtime designed for running AI agents on real hardware, offline, with hardware I/O support and a visual builder, supporting multi-provider LLMs and on-device RAG.
AI agents still suck, so I built my own
The author built a custom AI agent application wrapping Claude Code and upcoming Codex support, focusing on composable workflows and seeking community feedback.
Should an agent be code or a declared thing with its own runtime?
The author argues that AI agents in production should be defined as declarative manifests with their own runtime, rather than being scattered across application code, in order to enable proper versioning, observability, and rollback. They present their own solution as an open-source tool.
@hwchase17: https://x.com/hwchase17/status/2053157547985834227
The article outlines a systematic 'Agent Development Lifecycle' (Build, Test, Deploy, Monitor) for creating and managing AI agents effectively, highlighting key frameworks like LangChain, LangGraph, and CrewAI.
Agents are meant to be shared, but existing tooling is not fit for purpose
The author discusses the difficulty of sharing AI agent workflows across teams and introduces Nairi, a tool for deploying Claude Code-backed agents in Slack with shared access.