@omarsar0: I keep saying that the token efficiency on these models are underestimated. Be more ambitious with these models. Try di…

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

Omar argues that token efficiency in AI models is underestimated and cites Artificial Analysis reporting DeepSeek completing benchmark tasks at 105x lower cost than Fable.

I keep saying that the token efficiency on these models are underestimated. Be more ambitious with these models. Try different harnesses. Intelligence too cheap to meter is here!
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/03/26, 09:39 AM

I keep saying that the token efficiency on these models are underestimated. Be more ambitious with these models. Try different harnesses.

Intelligence too cheap to meter is here!

Cline (@cline): While DeepSeek V4-Flash is significantly cheaper on price per token, this can be misleading if the overall cost per task ends up being higher due to more turns being made.

However, @ArtificialAnlys reports DeepSeek completing the same benchmark tasks as Fable at 105x lower cost.

Similar Articles

Price per 1M tokens is meaningless

Hacker News Top

This article argues that comparing AI models by price per million tokens is misleading due to differences in tokenizers and token efficiency. It provides a benchmark cost analysis showing that models with higher per-token prices can be cheaper per completed task, with DeepSeek V4 Pro being a strong cost-efficiency outlier.

Same AI model. Better results. Lower cost.

Reddit r/AI_Agents

The author argues that AI coding harnesses and model routing are as important as the model itself, sharing tests with Oh-My-Pi and OpenCode that cut token usage and errors, and recommending tiered model subscriptions for high-volume lightweight tasks.