@s4yonnara: You're using AI agents like it's 2024. There are 5 levels and most people never leave the first. Boris Cherny, the crea…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

Boris Cherny, creator of Claude Code, outlines five levels of AI agent usage, from basic prompting to autonomous agents that start and learn on their own, with the key insight that the agent itself is the worst judge of task completion.

You're using AI agents like it's 2024. There are 5 levels and most people never leave the first. Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, says he barely prompts it anymore. Loops prompt it. His job is to build the loops. Level 1. Prompting. You type, read, type again. You are the loop. Level 2. Manual loop. Do, check, fix, repeat, all by hand. Still you turning the crank. Level 3. Verified loop. You define "done" and a separate check enforces it. The doer never grades itself. Level 4. Self-running loop. Set a goal, it runs across turns on its own until it holds. That's the /goal primitive in Claude Code. Level 5. Autonomous agents. Loops that start themselves, run in parallel, and write their own lessons back. You stop running an agent and start running an organization of them. The catch nobody mentions. The agent that did the work is the worst judge of whether it's done. Every level up rests on something separate that can say no. Most people are stuck low for one reason. Nobody told them the ladder exists. Find your rung. Climb. Full breakdown in the article below.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/26/26, 10:16 PM

You’re using AI agents like it’s 2024. There are 5 levels and most people never leave the first.

Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, says he barely prompts it anymore. Loops prompt it. His job is to build the loops.

Level 1. Prompting. You type, read, type again. You are the loop.

Level 2. Manual loop. Do, check, fix, repeat, all by hand. Still you turning the crank.

Level 3. Verified loop. You define “done” and a separate check enforces it. The doer never grades itself.

Level 4. Self-running loop. Set a goal, it runs across turns on its own until it holds. That’s the /goal primitive in Claude Code.

Level 5. Autonomous agents. Loops that start themselves, run in parallel, and write their own lessons back. You stop running an agent and start running an organization of them.

The catch nobody mentions. The agent that did the work is the worst judge of whether it’s done. Every level up rests on something separate that can say no.

Most people are stuck low for one reason. Nobody told them the ladder exists.

Find your rung. Climb.

Full breakdown in the article below.

every level up rests on something that can actually say no. you nailed the core of it

appreciate it bro, glad the ladder made sense

Similar Articles

The 7 Levels of AI User (and how to level up)

YouTube AI Channels

The article outlines a 7-level framework for AI user proficiency, ranging from basic search replacement to building autonomous agent systems. It provides strategies for advancing through each stage, such as context engineering and multi-tool integration.

Why is every agent ever made just a worse Claude Code?

Reddit r/AI_Agents

A developer questions the value of building specialized AI agents when general-purpose tools like Claude Code can accomplish the same tasks, suggesting that current agentic approaches are just less capable versions of Claude with extra guardrails.

@DivyanshT91162: https://x.com/DivyanshT91162/status/2057692858501804435

X AI KOLs Timeline

Andrej Karpathy's observations on AI coding agent behavior led to the viral CLAUDE.md file, which provides 4 behavioral rules for AI agents and became one of the fastest-growing repositories on GitHub, signaling a shift from AI intelligence to AI discipline in coding.