AI will agree with your idea and the exact opposite idea in the same chat. Very supportive, slightly concerning.
Summary
The article discusses how AI chatbots can agree with both sides of an argument in the same conversation, raising concerns about their reliability for providing objective feedback and critical thinking support.
Similar Articles
Are AI assistants becoming too good at agreeing with us?
An opinion piece discussing whether AI assistants should be less agreeable and more like critical thinking partners to enhance user interaction and avoid reinforcing biases.
AI is confidently wrong way more than people give it credit for, change my mind
A user shares concerns about AI models presenting thin or ambiguous data with the same confidence as well-supported findings, citing a case where a complaint appearing only twice in 200 comments was ranked as a top concern. The piece questions whether this is a fixable prompting issue or a fundamental limitation requiring manual verification.
Where's the line between AI helping with research vs AI just telling you what you want to hear?
A user shares concerns about using LLMs to analyze customer feedback, noting that models can present rare objections with confidence, and suggests spot-checking raw data to validate AI-generated patterns.
Does AI really help or is everyone against it have a point
The author discusses whether AI is helpful or harmful, sharing personal experience that it accelerated learning when used with proper context and honesty, and counters common criticisms about inaccuracies.
I asked AI to argue every side of 5 controversial topics — the devil's advocate takes are wild
An experiment using an AI opinion tool generates multiple conflicting arguments on controversial topics like remote work, AI jobs, and Bitcoin, showing how the same subject yields wildly different takes depending on the angle.