Mechanisms of Prompt-Induced Hallucination in Vision-Language Models

arXiv cs.CL Papers

Summary

This paper investigates prompt-induced hallucinations in vision-language models through mechanistic analysis, identifying specific attention heads responsible for the models' tendency to favor textual prompts over visual evidence. The authors demonstrate that ablating these PIH-heads reduces hallucinations by at least 40% without additional training, revealing model-specific mechanisms underlying this failure mode.

arXiv:2601.05201v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large vision-language models (VLMs) are highly capable, yet often hallucinate by favoring textual prompts over visual evidence. We study this failure mode in a controlled object-counting setting, where the prompt overstates the number of objects in the image (e.g., asking a model to describe four waterlilies when only three are present). At low object counts, models often correct the overestimation, but as the number of objects increases, they increasingly conform to the prompt regardless of the discrepancy. Through mechanistic analysis of three VLMs, we identify a small set of attention heads whose ablation substantially reduces prompt-induced hallucinations (PIH) by at least 40% without additional training. Across models, PIH-heads mediate prompt copying in model-specific ways. We characterize these differences and show that PIH ablation increases correction toward visual evidence. Our findings offer insights into the internal mechanisms driving prompt-induced hallucinations, revealing model-specific differences in how these behaviors are implemented.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 04/20/26, 08:33 AM

# Mechanisms of Prompt-Induced Hallucination in Vision-Language Models
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05201
View PDF (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.05201)

> Abstract: Large vision-language models (VLMs) are highly capable, yet often hallucinate by favoring textual prompts over visual evidence. We study this failure mode in a controlled object-counting setting, where the prompt overstates the number of objects in the image (e.g., asking a model to describe four waterlilies when only three are present). At low object counts, models often correct the overestimation, but as the number of objects increases, they increasingly conform to the prompt regardless of the discrepancy. Through mechanistic analysis of three VLMs, we identify a small set of attention heads whose ablation substantially reduces prompt-induced hallucinations (PIH) by at least 40% without additional training. Across models, PIH-heads mediate prompt copying in model-specific ways. We characterize these differences and show that PIH ablation increases correction toward visual evidence. Our findings offer insights into the internal mechanisms driving prompt-induced hallucinations, revealing model-specific differences in how these behaviors are implemented.

## Submission history

From: William Rudman Jr [view email (https://arxiv.org/show-email/22c8a476/2601.05201)] **[v1]** Thu, 8 Jan 2026 18:23:03 UTC (4,825 KB) **[v2]** Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:14:39 UTC (4,822 KB)

Similar Articles

From Architecture to Output: Structural Origins of Hallucination in Large Language Models and the Amplifying Role of Data

arXiv cs.AI

This paper analyzes hallucination in large language models as a structural consequence of three architectural decisions: self-attention's co-occurrence learning, maximum likelihood estimation training objective, and autoregressive decoding's left-to-right commitment. It maps each mechanism to specific hallucination types and argues that dataset pathologies amplify but do not cause these vulnerabilities.

Understanding Why Language Models Hallucinate: Testing Reasoning Against Priors

arXiv cs.CL

This paper studies why language models hallucinate, proposing that hallucinations often stem from biased latent inference (inference misalignment) rather than missing knowledge. It introduces TrapQA, a controlled diagnostic testbed to test reasoning against priors, and demonstrates that hallucinations can arise from misleading latent associations.

Dismantling Pathological Shortcuts: A Causal Framework for Faithful LVLM Decoding

arXiv cs.AI

This paper reveals that hallucination in large vision-language models is caused by a dynamic structural misalignment where certain attention heads act as risky mediators, decoupling from visual evidence to lock onto language priors. The authors propose Fox, a training-free causal intervention framework that diagnoses and physically severs these pathological shortcuts, achieving state-of-the-art performance in faithful decoding.