AJ-Bench: Benchmarking Agent-as-a-Judge for Environment-Aware Evaluation
Summary
AJ-Bench introduces a benchmark to evaluate Agent-as-a-Judge systems that interact with environments to verify agent behaviors across 155 tasks in search, data systems, and GUI domains.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 04/22/26, 10:35 AM
Paper page - AJ-Bench: Benchmarking Agent-as-a-Judge for Environment-Aware Evaluation
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2604.18240 Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
Agent-as-a-Judge benchmark evaluates automated verification capabilities across multiple domains with comprehensive task assessment.
Asreinforcement learningcontinues to scale the training of large language model-based agents, reliably verifying agent behaviors in complex environments has become increasingly challenging. Existing approaches rely on rule-based verifiers orLLM-as-a-Judgemodels, which struggle to generalize beyond narrow domains.Agent-as-a-Judgeaddresses this limitation by actively interacting with environments and tools to acquire verifiable evidence, yet its capabilities remain underexplored. We introduce a benchmarkAJ-Benchto systematically evaluateAgent-as-a-Judgeacross three domains-search, data systems, and graphical user interfaces-comprising 155 tasks and 516 annotated trajectories. The benchmark comprehensively assesses judge agents’ abilities ininformation acquisition,state verification, andprocess verification. Experiments demonstrate consistent performance gains overLLM-as-a-Judgebaselines, while also revealing substantial open challenges inagent-based verification. Our data and code are available at https://aj-bench.github.io/.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub0Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2604\.18240
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.18240 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.18240 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2604.18240 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
AgentJudgeBench: A Multi-Difficulty Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Judges on Agentic Tool-Calling
AgentJudgeBench is a benchmark for evaluating the reliability of LLM judges in agentic tool-calling scenarios, revealing limitations like structural ceilings and the nuanced impact of ground truth on alignment.
Online Agent-as-a-Judge: Situation-Generating Evaluation for Interactive Agents
Proposes Online Agent-as-a-Judge, an evaluation framework that uses an in-world evaluator agent to actively generate situations for testing interactive social agents, improving coverage and reliability over passive methods.
JobBench: Aligning Agent Work With Human Will
JobBench is a benchmark built from worker surveys to evaluate AI agents on tasks that workers most want automated, covering 130 tasks across 35 professions with detailed rubrics.
AgenticDataBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Data Agents
Introduces AgenticDataBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLM-based data agents across diverse domains with fine-grained skill-based metrics, including real-world B2B use cases and synthetic tasks.
HealthAgentBench: A Unified Benchmark Suite of Realistic Agentic Healthcare Environments for Challenging Frontier AI Agents
This paper introduces HealthAgentBench, a suite of 54 realistic healthcare tasks for evaluating frontier AI agents. It finds that even the best agent (Codex GPT-5.5) achieves only ~42% success, highlighting substantial room for improvement.