After talking to 20+ teams running LLMs in production, 3 pain points kept coming up independently
Summary
Based on conversations with over 20 teams, the author identifies three recurring pain points when using LLMs in production: enterprise-only basics, lack of agent observability, and slow support for new models.
Similar Articles
Your LLM prompt has 200 lines. Do you actually know if the agent follows any of them?
This article discusses the challenges of evaluating and monitoring LLM-based agents in production, covering offline evals, prompt engineering pitfalls, observability tools, review queues, labeling, clustering, topic classification, and cost-effective layering of human review, LLM-as-a-judge, and small classifiers.
Beyond LLMs: Why Scalable Enterprise AI Adoption Depends on Agent Logic
IBM Research explores how agent logic—software primitives like knowledge graphs and program analysis—can guide LLM-based agents to efficiently handle complex enterprise workflows, reducing hallucinations and costs while improving outcomes.
How are top tech companies actually using LLMs internally beyond basic coding help?
This post explores how major tech companies like Google, Meta, and OpenAI are utilizing advanced LLM workflows internally, focusing on agentic tasks, human-in-the-loop systems, and practical applications beyond basic coding. It seeks real-world use cases and operational routines that smaller startups and teams can adapt to improve productivity and efficiency.
LLMs and Memory Limitations - review my thoughts pls
An analysis of LLM memory limitations, arguing that true personal AI requires single-tenant weight customization which conflicts with current multi-tenant cloud economics, and highlighting open-weight models as the likely source of progress.
My agent is too damn expensive! What do you wish you knew about your LLM token burn?
A discussion post about the high costs of running LLM agents, with users sharing frustrations and seeking advice on tracking token spending and improving efficiency.