DEI: Diversity in Evolutionary Inference for Quality-Diversity Search
Summary
DEI introduces a distributed Quality-Diversity search framework using heterogeneous LLMs as mutation operators, showing that model diversity improves performance over homogeneous parallel approaches. Evaluated on the Core War domain, a four-node heterogeneous ensemble achieves significant gains in QD-Score and coverage.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/10/26, 12:12 AM
Paper page - DEI: Diversity in Evolutionary Inference for Quality-Diversity Search
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.27130
Abstract
A distributed Quality-Diversity search framework uses heterogeneous large language models as mutation operators to enhance evolutionary inference, demonstrating that model diversity improves performance over homogeneous parallel approaches.
We present DEI: Diversity inEvolutionary Inference, a distributedQuality-Diversity(QD) search framework that assignsheterogeneous large language models(LLMs) asmutation operatorsacrosspeer nodescommunicating withnon-blocking collective operations. Unlike homogeneous parallel search, which replicates a single model’s inductive biases across all workers, DEI treats each LLM’s distinct creative prior as a complementary source of behavioral novelty. Extending theDigital Red Queen frameworkwith DEI, nodes sharelocal optimal solutionsat the end of each round to seed the next round’s population. This createscross-model adversarial pressurethat drives robustness beyond intra-model self-play. Evaluated on theCore Wardomain, a competitive programming benchmark in whichRedcode warrior programsbattle inside a simulated machine, a four-node heterogeneous ensemble (GPT-5.4-mini, Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5.2, and Claude Haiku 4.5) achieves 124 percent higher merged-archiveQD-Score(45.90 vs. 20.46) and 28 percent highercoverage(80.6 percent vs. 63.0 percent of cells) than a single-node baseline at equal total LLM-call budget. The heterogeneous ensemble also outperforms an equally-budgeted homogeneous ensemble onQD-Score,coverage, andheld-out solution generalityacross all four model families. These results provide the first empirical evidence that model diversity, not merely parallelism, is the key driver of gain in distributed LLM-based QD search.
View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub2Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2605\.27130
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.27130 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.27130 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.27130 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
QDEvo: A Multi-Objective Quality-Diversity Framework for Automated Heuristic Design
QDEvo integrates Quality-Diversity optimization with LLM-driven heuristic search to overcome mode collapse in automated heuristic design, outperforming state-of-the-art methods on benchmarks and real-world applications.
Beyond Average Performance: Dynamic Instance Clustering and Specialized Algorithm Design in LLM-Assisted Evolutionary Search
This paper introduces DyCA, a framework for LLM-assisted evolutionary search that uses dynamic instance clustering to improve tail robustness under heterogeneous instance distributions, outperforming existing LES baselines on four algorithm design tasks.
Towards Diverse Scientific Hypothesis Search with Large Language Models
This paper proposes an evolutionary framework inspired by parallel tempering that uses multi-temperature sampling and information exchange to improve the diversity and quality of scientific hypotheses generated by large language models, demonstrated across molecular, equation, and algorithm discovery.
Which Models Work Well Together? Measuring Heterogeneity for LLM Team Selection
The paper proposes a heterogeneity-driven framework for selecting complementary LLM teams by profiling error decorrelation and predictive divergence, then greedily optimizing a quality–complementarity objective, showing gains over quality-only top-k baselines across multiple benchmarks.
EvoDuet: Bilevel Co-Evolution of Web Searching and Task Solving for Scientific Discovery
EvoDuet introduces a bilevel optimization framework that co-evolves solutions and web search queries with fixed LLM parameters, using a retrieval gate to decide when to fetch new documents versus reusing stored ones. Across 21 tasks it boosts OpenEvolve's normalized discovery gain notably (e.g., 61.3% to 82.3% with Gemini-3.8-Flash), surpassing prior best scores on eight tasks and generalizing across different evolutionary search scaffolds.